2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of energy-saving strategies and operational costs in full-scale membrane bioreactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to aerobic MBR, for instance Gabarró n et al reported values for total specific energy demand in a full-scale aerobic MBR reaching 1.54 kW h m −3 for flat-sheet membrane and 1.12 kW h m −3 for hollowfibre membrane [71]. Even after implementation of their energy-saving strategies involving mainly optimization of both biological aeration and membrane air-scouring, the specific energy demand reached 1.12 kW h m −3 and 0.71 kW h m −3 , respectively, regardless of similar yearly averaged hydraulic loads [71].…”
Section: Operational Costs Of Anmbrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to aerobic MBR, for instance Gabarró n et al reported values for total specific energy demand in a full-scale aerobic MBR reaching 1.54 kW h m −3 for flat-sheet membrane and 1.12 kW h m −3 for hollowfibre membrane [71]. Even after implementation of their energy-saving strategies involving mainly optimization of both biological aeration and membrane air-scouring, the specific energy demand reached 1.12 kW h m −3 and 0.71 kW h m −3 , respectively, regardless of similar yearly averaged hydraulic loads [71].…”
Section: Operational Costs Of Anmbrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison of operation cost and energy consumption of MBR and conventional process are shown in Table 8. Energy consumption accounts for 50%-70% of MBR operation cost (Zheng et al, 2016;Meng et al, 2012;Gabarrón et al, 2014). For municipal wastewater, both operation cost and energy consumption of MBR are higher than those of conventional WWTPs.…”
Section: Operation Issues Cost and Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors reported energy consumption values of an MBR were in the range of 0.7-0.8 kWh m À3 (Krzeminski et al, 2012) and 0.4-0.7 kWh m À3 when operating the MBR at optimal condition in municipal facilities. Gabarron et al (2014) reported that energy consumption of a MBR using a flatsheet membrane was lower than it was when using a hollowfiber stand-alone MBR. In addition, specific organic load in industrial wastewater is higher than it is in wastewater from municipal facilities; thus, a combined process is key to reducing energy consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%