2010
DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of email communication skills of rheumatology fellows: a pilot study

Abstract: Physician-patient email communication is gaining popularity. However, a formal assessment of physicians' email communication skills has not been described. We hypothesized that the email communication skills of rheumatology fellows can be measured in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) setting using a novel email content analysis instrument which has 18 items. During an OSCE, we asked 50 rheumatology fellows to respond to a simulated patient email. The content of the responses was assessed usin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most literature discussing the use of e-mail communication in the health care sector deals with guidelines for proper e-mail use between physicians and patients in terms of the utility and appropriateness of such communication. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The American Medical Association has also developed e-mail communication guidelines for physicians 19 ; similar to the aforementioned literature, these guidelines refer to the appropriate use and security of e-mail as a medium of care delivery, not necessarily specific suggestions for writing e-mail messages with optical characteristics that recipients will tend to favor.…”
Section: Relevant Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most literature discussing the use of e-mail communication in the health care sector deals with guidelines for proper e-mail use between physicians and patients in terms of the utility and appropriateness of such communication. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The American Medical Association has also developed e-mail communication guidelines for physicians 19 ; similar to the aforementioned literature, these guidelines refer to the appropriate use and security of e-mail as a medium of care delivery, not necessarily specific suggestions for writing e-mail messages with optical characteristics that recipients will tend to favor.…”
Section: Relevant Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Can you tell me in your own words what you have understood and then, if necessary, I can help clarify An example of integrating the view of the patients with regard to his/her condition is the application of PROs (Patient-Reported Outcomes), with disease-specific instruments as there is the RAID [46] (rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease) or generic instruments such as the short-form (SF)36 [47]. Online communication between patients and professionals is gaining popularity, and it helps to overcome a barrier to be able to reach the specialist at certain times [48].…”
Section: The Clinician-patient Relationship Is the Central Component ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An intern, a fourth–year Health Management Systems student from Rangos School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University, evaluated each de–identified response for the purposes of this research project. We read each individual case and compared it against a rubric adapted and modified from a study by Mittal et al 23 to reflect a dental focus (Appendix B). We collectively discussed discrepancies of responses to achieve agreement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mittal et al have developed a scoring instrument (rubric) to evaluate responses measuring whether 1) fellows understand the provider–patient relationship, 2) they are aware of the administrative, confidentiality, and legal aspects of e–mail communication, and 3) they are able to compose a response in a professional manner. The responses of the fellows showed wide variation, highlighting the need for including didactic modules on e–mail communication in the fellowship program or earlier in medical education 23 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%