2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00353-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of efficient sampling designs for urban stormwater monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Between 10 and 15 discrete grab samples were collected per storm at approximately 30-to 60-minute intervals for each site-event based on optimal sampling frequencies in southern California described by Leecaster et al (2001).…”
Section: Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 10 and 15 discrete grab samples were collected per storm at approximately 30-to 60-minute intervals for each site-event based on optimal sampling frequencies in southern California described by Leecaster et al (2001).…”
Section: Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, TOC can reflect the true distribution of organic pollutants in the water column because of the strong affiliation of hydrophobic chemicals with organic matter. As a result, the effectiveness of sampling designs seems to be better assessed by TOC than SPM, although SPM was also used to examine the efficiency of sampling designs elsewhere (Leecaster et al 2002). …”
Section: Effectiveness Of Minimum Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods giving up iid consist of either using a space and/or time structure or using dependence on other variables that are easier to obtain at a better resolution. In the case of quality monitoring of surface water, the first explanatory variable is obviously discharge, which can be used in the sampling strategy, the design of composite samples and the interpolation of concentration, in a variety of methods compared by simulation (Leecaster et al 2002). However, McGrath et al (2010) have pointed out the influence of within-storm variability of rainfall on the loading of solutes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%