2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of early auditory development of very young Finnish children with LittlEARS® Auditory Questionnaire and McArthur Communicative Developmental Inventories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LEAQ could potentially cover this need. The idea of monitoring the early development of communicative and auditory development in children with the LEAQ was investigated by Rauham€ aki et al (2014). They compared an abridged version of the Finnish CDI to the LEAQ and concluded that these instruments covered the most important milestones in preverbal development.…”
Section: Measures Of Auditory and Early Language Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LEAQ could potentially cover this need. The idea of monitoring the early development of communicative and auditory development in children with the LEAQ was investigated by Rauham€ aki et al (2014). They compared an abridged version of the Finnish CDI to the LEAQ and concluded that these instruments covered the most important milestones in preverbal development.…”
Section: Measures Of Auditory and Early Language Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study recommended that the LEAQ could be implemented in the Child Health Care Centres (CHCs) in Finland for all DHH children. The authors suggested that it could detect hearing problems in children between the Newborn Hearing Screening (NHS) and their national hearing screening at 4 years of age (Rauham€ aki et al 2014).…”
Section: Measures Of Auditory and Early Language Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influencing factors remain to be verified. Previous subjective questionnaires such as the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ), the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19), or the LittlEARS Auditory questionnaire (LEAQ ® ) do evaluate the subjective quality of hearing but do not actually reflect the users’ satisfaction, which might in turn possibly increase the motivation to wear the device for longer [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. Recently, Obrycka et al, 2022, reported on Audio Processor Satisfaction pre and post AO upgrade and found no significant difference between the device generations [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%