2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2003.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of downstream trends in channel gradient, total and specific stream power: a GIS approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
98
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
98
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Costa and O'Connor (1995) established relationships between stream power and incision or degradation, and other studies have addressed geomorphic changes and effectiveness, channel stability and planform, and especially channel sensitivity to high-magnitude flood events (Bagnold, 1966;Magilligan, 1992;Costa and O'Connor, 1995;Reinfelds et al, 2004). Most studies relating stream power to channel processes have favoured exploring such relationships with specific stream power, which provides a measure of the rate of energy expenditure per unit area of channel bed (Reinfelds et al, 2004).…”
Section: Significant Peak Flow Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costa and O'Connor (1995) established relationships between stream power and incision or degradation, and other studies have addressed geomorphic changes and effectiveness, channel stability and planform, and especially channel sensitivity to high-magnitude flood events (Bagnold, 1966;Magilligan, 1992;Costa and O'Connor, 1995;Reinfelds et al, 2004). Most studies relating stream power to channel processes have favoured exploring such relationships with specific stream power, which provides a measure of the rate of energy expenditure per unit area of channel bed (Reinfelds et al, 2004).…”
Section: Significant Peak Flow Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While other smoother functions, such as moving averages, can also be used, the problem with removing spikes in longitudinal profiles using moving averages is one of information preservation. If the span (or averaging window) is too small, spikes remain, but if the window is too large important geomorphic data are averaged out alongside the spikes -ultimately changing the shape of the longitudinal profile from its fundamental form (Reinfelds et al 2004;Jain et al 2006;. Local regression, with and without weights and robustness (lowess, leoss, rlowess and rloess) can also be utilized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was developed into the 'stream power screening tool' [4,35], a bankfull-level assessment with the purpose of rapidly identifying potential sediment issues along a river network and prioritising reaches for further geomorphological investigation. Similarly, Reinfelds et al [116] and Jain et al [117] illustrated how abrupt changes in channel slope along a watercourse, and therefore discontinuities in power, can be linked to deviations from average rates of sediment transport and storage.…”
Section: Stream Energy Approaches In Fluvial Studies: Underpinning Comentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, where data are available two problematic areas remain: accuracy where banklines are obscured in images or where scans are unreliably filtered for vegetation [141]; wetted width at the time of survey is merely a snapshot of the geometry and might not represent either the bankfull or a temporally-averaged condition [143]. Similarly, for unsurveyed reaches broad-scale channel slope is measured routinely from longitudinal profiles derived from remotely sensed topography and GIS methods (e.g., [116,120,[159][160][161][162]). …”
Section: Cross-sections and Slopementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation