1995
DOI: 10.1177/009286159502900324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Dose Proportionality: Report from the Statisticians in the Pharmaceutical Industry/Pharmacokinetics UK Joint Working Party

Abstract: There are a number of different approaches to the assessment of doseproportionality, but most of these are directed toward hypothesis testing. The analysis of dose proportionality studies, however, requires estimation rather than significance testing in order that the pharmacokinetic and clinical significance of any nonproportionality can be assessed.The methods of statistical analysis of thesestudies have been reviewed. A n empirical model relating the log of thepharmacokineticparameter linearly to the log of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
212
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
212
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the data met the criteria for dose proportionality over the entire dose range using the intercept test (23), power model (22), and ANOVA testing of the dosenormalized, log-transformed AUC 0 -24 as a function of dose level (data not shown; ref. 22).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the data met the criteria for dose proportionality over the entire dose range using the intercept test (23), power model (22), and ANOVA testing of the dosenormalized, log-transformed AUC 0 -24 as a function of dose level (data not shown; ref. 22).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean Col-3 average trough concentration at steady-state values were calculated by deriving the mean of the pretreatment Col-3 plasma concentrations measured on days 8, 15, 22, and 29. Dose proportional changes in AUC 0 -24 and peak plasma concentration values were examined by application of the intercept test, the power model (22), and by one-way ANOVA of the log-transformed dose-normalized pharmacokinetic parameters (23).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dose proportionality of nitisinone AUC 24 and C max , respectively, was evaluated using a power model (Gough et al 1995).…”
Section: Calculations and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dose proportionality of the AUC and C max variables was examined by two separate methods, the intercept test (17) and the power model (18). For the intercept test of dose proportionality, weighed linear regression of the untransformed AUC and C max versus dose level plot was done and the intercept estimated for each (17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%