2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-006-0135-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of doped ceria as electrolyte

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
88
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior is not noted when a higher load of 300 mA cm −2 is applied, due to the fact that the leakage current density becomes null when enough current density is extracted, and the whole electronic current introduced at the electrodes converts into ionic current in the electrolyte. As effectively summarized by Dalslet et al, 3 the electrolyte becomes a better (ion-transferring) electrolyte at increasing the current load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This behavior is not noted when a higher load of 300 mA cm −2 is applied, due to the fact that the leakage current density becomes null when enough current density is extracted, and the whole electronic current introduced at the electrodes converts into ionic current in the electrolyte. As effectively summarized by Dalslet et al, 3 the electrolyte becomes a better (ion-transferring) electrolyte at increasing the current load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…• C. [1][2][3][4][5] Associated to a high ionic conductivity, however, these materials show mixed ionic and electronic conductive (MIEC) properties, and their electronic conductivity increases when exposed to reducing atmospheres. The MIEC character of the electrolyte, in turn, results in the onset of electronic leakage currents (or short circuit currents) and low open-circuit voltage values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter point follows from the conductivities of CGO being ≈0.001 S/cm at 350 °C [21] while the conductivity of the molten KNO 3 at 350 °C is 0.699 S/cm [36], which means at 350 °C the reduced serial resistance observed for the KNO 3 impregnated sample may be explained by the current passing through the KNO 3 instead of the CGO electrolyte . Unfortunately it has despite of extensive search not been possible to find information on the conductivity of K 2 O and solid KNO 3 at 300 °C, for this reason it cannot be estimated here, if an alternative current path is a realistic explanation of the reduced serial resistance observed on the impregnated cell stacks at 300 °C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The stacks were subjected to electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and conversion/polarisation experiments while the gas composition was monitored by a mass spectrometer (MS) and a chemiluminiscense detector (CLD). The cell stacks differed from each other in the way they were impregnated: one stack had no impregnation, one stack was impregnated with KNO 3 and one stack was impregnated with K 2 O. LSF was chosen as electrode material, since LSF as a mixed conductor [18] [19] has been evaluated to be a promising material for intermediate temperate solid oxide electrodes [20] while CGO was chosen as an electrolyte, as CGO has superior oxygen ion-conductivity below 600 °C when compared to yttria stabilized zirconia [21]. KNO 3 /K 2 O was chosen for impregnation, as potassium is known to act both as a NO x -storage compound [22] and also to improve simultaneous NO x and soot removal [23,24], the latter being of interest for future development of the electrochemical deNO x technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S δ = (16) Considering the separation of the Boltzmann distribution and Maxwell's demon, the generalized expression obtained from Equations (12) and Equation (13) …”
Section: Additional Thermodynamic Law Based On the Advanced Model Of mentioning
confidence: 99%