1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2795(199909)54:1<1::aid-mrd1>3.0.co;2-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of DNA damage in individual hamster embryos by comet assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the rapidly spreading use of time-lapse observations, especially on human embryos in fertility clinics, it is important to investigate, whether light exposure for image recording affects or even compromises the embryo's developmental competence. Different measures based on studies of animal model embryos have already been implemented to minimize light exposure of visible [15] or longer wavelength light [2,15,16], and in combination with sensitive camera systems it is possible to obtain high quality images for evaluation without disadvantages on embryonic development and quality [17]. Microscopy typically works with visible light (380-700 nm), where wavelengths <500-550 nm are regarded as harmful to the development and quality of mammalian embryos [2,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the rapidly spreading use of time-lapse observations, especially on human embryos in fertility clinics, it is important to investigate, whether light exposure for image recording affects or even compromises the embryo's developmental competence. Different measures based on studies of animal model embryos have already been implemented to minimize light exposure of visible [15] or longer wavelength light [2,15,16], and in combination with sensitive camera systems it is possible to obtain high quality images for evaluation without disadvantages on embryonic development and quality [17]. Microscopy typically works with visible light (380-700 nm), where wavelengths <500-550 nm are regarded as harmful to the development and quality of mammalian embryos [2,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mammalian cells, the function of fibroblast cells was disrupted when the total dose of blue light was increased to 10 kJ/m 2 [18]. However, most studies only use light intensity to quantify illumination effect on embryos [3,15,16]. Light at longer wavelength carries lower energy and red light is recommended as a safe illumination source for embryo observation systems [15] and is now routinely applied in timelapse incubation systems [11,12,[19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, in vitro produced embryos as well as oocytes are prone to various environmental factors during manipulations in laboratories [1]. The adverse effects of pH fluctuations [2,3], high and low laboratory temperature [4], change in carbon dioxide and O 2 level [5,6] and light [7,8] have been investigated to some extent. Among the environmental factors, light is known to exert some harmful effects on developmental competence of mammalian oocytes and embryos [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments on preimplantation rabbit embryos have shown that after exposure of embryos to 1,600 lx visible light for 8 h the development of day-1 embryos had decreased. In addition, development of hamster 1-cell embryos has also been impaired following exposure to visible light in a timedependant manner [8]. In contrast, mouse oocytes exposed to 4,000 lx visible light for 1 to 4 h had both normal fertilization and speed of cleavage [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, heat stress-induced maternal hyperthermia enhances ROS production in the oviduct (Ozawa et al 2004, Matsuzuka et al 2005a, 2005b and lipid peroxidation in the liver (Matsuzuka et al 2005b). ROS are strongly reactive with cellular molecules and can cause serious dysfunction, such as enzyme inactivation (Halliwell & Gutteridge 1984), mitochondrial abnormalities (Kowaltowski & Vercesi 1999) and DNA fragmentation (Lopes et al 1998, Takahashi et al 1999.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%