Assessment of Disparities Associated With a Crisis Standards of Care Resource Allocation Algorithm for Patients in 2 US Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Significant concern has been raised that crisis standards of care policies aimed at guiding resource allocation may be biased against people based on race/ethnicity. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether unanticipated disparities by race or ethnicity arise from a single institution's resource allocation policy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study included adults (aged Ն18 years) who were cared for on a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ward or in a monitored unit requiring invasive or noninvasive ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula between May 26 and July 14, 2020, at 2 academic hospitals in Miami, Florida. EXPOSURES Race (ie, White, Black, Asian, multiracial) and ethnicity (ie, non-Hispanic, Hispanic). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was based on a resource allocation priority score (range, 1-8, with 1 indicating highest and 8 indicating lowest priority) that was assigned daily based on both estimated short-term (using Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score) and longer-term (using comorbidities) mortality. There were 2 coprimary outcomes: maximum and minimum score for each patient over all eligible patient-days. Standard summary statistics were used to describe the cohort, and multivariable Poisson regression was used to identify associations of race and ethnicity with each outcome. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 5613 patient-days of data from 1127 patients (median [interquartile range {IQR}] age, 62.7 [51.7-73.7]; 607 [53.9%] men). Of these, 711 (63.1%) were White patients, 323 (28.7%) were Black patients, 8 (0.7%) were Asian patients, and 31 (2.8%) were multiracial patients; 480 (42.6%) were non-Hispanic patients, and 611 (54.2%) were Hispanic patients. The median (IQR) maximum priority score for the cohort was 3 (1-4); the median (IQR) minimum score was 2 (1-3). After adjustment, there was no association of race with maximum priority score using White patients as the reference group (Black patients: incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.89-1.12; Asian patients: IRR, 0.95; 95% CI. 0.62-1.45; multiracial patients: IRR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.72-1.19) or of ethnicity using non-Hispanic patients as the reference group (Hispanic patients: IRR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88-1.10); similarly, no association was found with minimum score for race, again with White patients as the reference group (Black patients: IRR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90-1.14; Asian patients: IRR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.62-1.49; multiracial patients: IRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.61-1.07) or ethnicity, again with non-Hispanic patients as the reference group (Hispanic patients: IRR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.89-1.13). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of adult patients admitted to a COVID-19 unit at 2 US hospitals, there was no association of race or ethnicity with the priority score underpinning (continued) Key Points Question Is there an association of race and/or ethnicity with priority scores based on both short-term and longerterm estimated mortality used for resource allocation under crisis standards of care? Findings In this retr...

Simulation of Ventilator Allocation in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19

“…Recent studies of general ICU patients without COVID-19 and a mixed population of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ICU patients in a single healthcare system found minimal or no association between race/ethnicity and priority tier (6,7). The inequities in survival found in our study are likely attributable to differences in study population and the simulation methodology.…”

“…While there is an active theoretical debate over these protocols, there have been few empirical assessments of their performance (6,7). We performed a Monte Carlo simulation of a severe ventilator shortage in a diverse, multi-center population of critically ill patients with COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation.…”

Accuracy of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for In-Hospital Mortality by Race and Relevance to Crisis Standards of Care

“… 25 Our results contrast with a report that did not find disparities associated with CSC. 30 Importantly, that report assessed the proportions of patients in racial groups who were assigned to different priorities without reporting survival differences between racial groups in the priority tiers. Our results highlight the importance of assessing not only proportions, but also short-term survival, a central goal of all CSC.…”

Ventilator Allocation Protocols: Sophisticated Bioethics for an Unworkable Strategy

“…More specifically, I am not aware of any data about whether or how the algorithms were actually used. One study examined how a ventilator allocation protocol would have performed if implemented on a retrospective database, but again, this study treated the database as representing a population of patients that could be evaluated simultaneously and did not reflect the real world, where patients present sequentially 3 …”