2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of diffusion coefficients of general solvents by PFG-NMR: Investigation of the sources error

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1). decays), and hence represents an interesting alternative to other setups designed to avoid these artifacts such as, for instance, post processing corrections [48], Shigemi tubes [50], or slice selective experiments [51].…”
Section: Absolute Gradient Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1). decays), and hence represents an interesting alternative to other setups designed to avoid these artifacts such as, for instance, post processing corrections [48], Shigemi tubes [50], or slice selective experiments [51].…”
Section: Absolute Gradient Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, as fast diffusing components, we analyzed by PFG MAS a set of standard solvents exhibiting different viscosities, and for which recent high quality NMR self-diffusion data has been published in the literature [50].…”
Section: Pfg Mas Diffusion Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One drastic measure to reduce the effects of non-uniformity is to use either slice selection [4,29,30] or a very short sample [31][32][33] to restrict the signals measured to a small volume over which the field gradient variation is small. Unfortunately both involve a major sacrifice in signal-to-noise ratio, as well as introducing problems where the diffusion distance is not small compared to the slice thickness, and their use is probably best limited to experiments where the analysis method used requires strict adherence to the exponential attenuation as a function of gradient squared seen in Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Diffusion coefficients (D) were calculated by (eqn. 3) and the hydrodynamic radius (r H ) by (eqn.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%