2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2007
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2007.4423476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of different classification algorithms for burnt land discrimination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up until now, several classification techniques have been applied in burned area mapping, including maximum likelihood classification [13,14], logistic regression [15], classification and regression trees [14,16] linear and/or nonlinear spectral mixture analysis [17,18], thresholding of Vegetation Indices (VIs) [14,19], Neural Networks [20], Neuro-Fuzzy techniques [21], Support Vector Machines (SVMs) [22][23][24], and Object Based Image Analysis (OBIA) [25,26]. However, the selection of the optimal method each time depends on several factors, such as the scale and the goals of the current project.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up until now, several classification techniques have been applied in burned area mapping, including maximum likelihood classification [13,14], logistic regression [15], classification and regression trees [14,16] linear and/or nonlinear spectral mixture analysis [17,18], thresholding of Vegetation Indices (VIs) [14,19], Neural Networks [20], Neuro-Fuzzy techniques [21], Support Vector Machines (SVMs) [22][23][24], and Object Based Image Analysis (OBIA) [25,26]. However, the selection of the optimal method each time depends on several factors, such as the scale and the goals of the current project.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%