2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of dietary supplementation with probiotics on performance, intestinal morphology and microflora of chickens infected with Eimeria tenella

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
76
2
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
13
76
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…No effects of supplemented treatments (P>0.05) could be observed in cecal Lactobacilli counts; however, total anaerobe counts tended to increase (P=0.07), Enterococci counts increased (P<0.05) and Escherichia coli counts decreased (P<0.05) due to probiotic supplementation (Table IV). These results are in partial agreement with those of Giannenas et al (2012) who did not observe differences in Lactobacilli, Enterococci and total anaerobe counts, but did observe lower Escherichia coli counts in the caecum of broilers fed a probiotic supplemented diet compared with the control. On the contrary, Mountzouris et al (2007) reported that including probiotics in the diet of broilers caused higher concentrations of Lactobacilli and gram-positive cocci (e.g., Enterococci, Pediococci) in the cecal microflora compared with the controls.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…No effects of supplemented treatments (P>0.05) could be observed in cecal Lactobacilli counts; however, total anaerobe counts tended to increase (P=0.07), Enterococci counts increased (P<0.05) and Escherichia coli counts decreased (P<0.05) due to probiotic supplementation (Table IV). These results are in partial agreement with those of Giannenas et al (2012) who did not observe differences in Lactobacilli, Enterococci and total anaerobe counts, but did observe lower Escherichia coli counts in the caecum of broilers fed a probiotic supplemented diet compared with the control. On the contrary, Mountzouris et al (2007) reported that including probiotics in the diet of broilers caused higher concentrations of Lactobacilli and gram-positive cocci (e.g., Enterococci, Pediococci) in the cecal microflora compared with the controls.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Gut micro-flora have important effects on host animal health, nutrition and performance by affecting utilization of nutrients and development of the GI system of the host (Barrow, 1992). This interaction is complex and, depending on the activity and composition of the gut micro-flora, it can have either negative or positive effects on animal health (Giannenas et al, 2012). Probiotic products influence the intestinal microbial system of monogastric animals in multiple ways (Ng et al, 2009).…”
Section: Effects Of Yeasture Supplementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of animals exposed to such a stressor are high producing dairy cows; especially those in early lactation induced in a negative energy balance. Lee et al (2009), Giannenas et al (2012 and Salim et al (2013) demonstrated altered intestinal morphometric measurements when B. subtilis bacterial strains were fed to broilers, and showed an increase in villus height and crypt depth in the small intestine. This might occur in the rumen of mature cows, as well as in the post ruminal GI tract, leading to increased villus height and width thereby increasing surface area available for absorption leading to increased nutrient absorption.…”
Section: Effects Of Yeasture Supplementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, heat stress enhanced the intestinal colonization of enteric bacteria such as Clostridium and Coliforms at the expense of the beneficial bacteria such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Similarly, recent reports indicated that supplementation with probiotics could increase numbers of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium and decrease numbers of Clostridium and Coliforms in broilers (Giannenas et al, 2012;Song et al, 2014). This indicated that heat stress can induce perturbation of the normal intestinal microflora which reduces innate protective mechanisms and increase the potential for pathogenic bacteria colonization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%