1995
DOI: 10.1016/0048-9697(95)04617-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of dermal exposure to chemicals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pyrethrins and pyrethroids also inhibit the chloride ion channel function at the GABA receptor-ionophore complex (Casida and Lawrence 1985). An additional target proposed for type II pyrethroids is the membrane chloride ion channel (Hemmen and Brouwer 1995). Generally type II pyrethroids decrease the open channel probability of chloride channels, but the type I pyrethroids do not seem to have an effect on the chlorine channel (Breckenridge et al 2009;Symington et al 1999;Burr and Ray 2004).…”
Section: Mechanism Of Pyrethroid Actionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Pyrethrins and pyrethroids also inhibit the chloride ion channel function at the GABA receptor-ionophore complex (Casida and Lawrence 1985). An additional target proposed for type II pyrethroids is the membrane chloride ion channel (Hemmen and Brouwer 1995). Generally type II pyrethroids decrease the open channel probability of chloride channels, but the type I pyrethroids do not seem to have an effect on the chlorine channel (Breckenridge et al 2009;Symington et al 1999;Burr and Ray 2004).…”
Section: Mechanism Of Pyrethroid Actionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The quantity of a pesticide on a patch is related to the area of the body region to which it is attached on the assumption of uniformity of deposition on the areas of the body. This assumption is the main limitation of this technique which can lead to errors with an under or over estimation of exposure, depending on where the patches had been located [5][6][7]. Nevertheless if these limitations are borne in mind this method can serve as a simple and cost-effective method in a wide range of comparative studies [8][9][10][11][12] for risk evaluation and to identify measures to reduce worker exposure in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Hemmen and Brouwer [5], Fenske [6] and Chester [7] report in their reviews that analytical methods should be validated to select the adequate sampling media (i.e. if the coverall used is able to retain the pesticide in study) as well as the analytical procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, sampling methods for potential dermal exposure are less complex, often involving the analysis of pesticide extracted from the coverall worn by workers during application. There are two traditional sampling methods; the patch and whole body dosimetry methods [7,14,15]. In addition, biological monitoring of pesticides in urine [7, [16][17][18][19] is a complementary approach that may give an indication of the absorbed dose, which is influenced by factors such as protection by work clothing, rate of skin penetration, and the effect of ambient conditions on dermal absorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%