2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of depressive symptom severity among patients with co-occurring bipolar disorder and substance dependence

Abstract: Background-We examined a modified version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) among treatment-seeking patients with co-occurring bipolar disorder and substance dependence in order to elucidate key features of depression in this specific population of patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High levels of disinhibition during manic or hypomanic phases of illness due to heavy alcohol or drug use may be an important underlying mechanism, 49,50 or increased risk of suicidality could be due to low mood induced or exacerbated by substance misuse during depressive illness phases. 51 Delusional thoughts may lead to suicidal ideation and acts in bipolar disorder, 52 and altered cognitive processing in relation to risk aversion 53 could be another common mechanism for these outcomes. Although we observed significant risk elevations in the unaffected sibling cohort, the ratios of effect sizes for the bipolar cohort versus those for the unaffected siblings were large, especially in relation to suicidality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High levels of disinhibition during manic or hypomanic phases of illness due to heavy alcohol or drug use may be an important underlying mechanism, 49,50 or increased risk of suicidality could be due to low mood induced or exacerbated by substance misuse during depressive illness phases. 51 Delusional thoughts may lead to suicidal ideation and acts in bipolar disorder, 52 and altered cognitive processing in relation to risk aversion 53 could be another common mechanism for these outcomes. Although we observed significant risk elevations in the unaffected sibling cohort, the ratios of effect sizes for the bipolar cohort versus those for the unaffected siblings were large, especially in relation to suicidality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, also other previous data indicating that affective psychiatric constructs such as depression and anxiety may not separate repeaters from nonrepeaters (Stein et al., 1998). Here, instead, troubles understanding, concentrating, or remembering, the ASI construct used to describe symptoms of cognitive difficulties (Kolodziej, Griffin, Bender, & Weiss, 2008; Mclellan, Erdlen, Erdlen, & O’brien, 1981; Niv & Hser, 2007), had an independent association with repeated attempt, and so did, to a lesser extent, difficulty controlling violent behavior. The association with difficulty controlling violent behavior is consistent with the findings of Stein et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, our sample was enrolled at a specialised unit for treatment of BD type I and may not necessarily represent the whole population with this disorder. Second, although HDRS has been largely used in clinical practice in the evaluation of bipolar patients, its psychometric properties may fail to capture the phenomenological nuances of bipolar depression, as it is based on and skewed towards the characteristics of unipolar depression (14–17). Third, the sample size limited subgroup analysis, and some confounding variables, such as number of previous episodes, were not controlled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%