2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13098-019-0457-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of dapagliflozin effect on diabetic endothelial dysfunction of brachial artery (ADDENDA-BHS2 trial): rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Background: Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is a hallmark in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) that favor both atherogenesis and ischemia and reperfusion injury (IRI). Sodium-glucose-2 co-transporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) may hypothetically improve microvascular and macrovascular functions via a broad spectrum of mechanisms, being superior to traditional antidiabetic therapy such as sulfonylurea, even in subjects under equivalent glycemic control. Hence, the present clinical trial was designed to compare the effect o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Assessment of Dapagliflozin Effect on Diabetic Endothelial Dysfunction of Brachial Artery-Brazilian Heart Study 2 (ADDENDA-BHS2) was a randomized, open-label, single-center study comparing equipotent glucose-lowering regimens of glibenclamide combined with metformin versus dapagliflozin combined with metformin in patients with T2DM and subclinical carotid atherosclerotic disease. Full details regarding the study selection criteria, procedures, and assessment of brachial artery function are published elsewhere [ 18 ] and described in depth in the Additional file 1 . Briefly, eligible patients were 40–70 years of age.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Assessment of Dapagliflozin Effect on Diabetic Endothelial Dysfunction of Brachial Artery-Brazilian Heart Study 2 (ADDENDA-BHS2) was a randomized, open-label, single-center study comparing equipotent glucose-lowering regimens of glibenclamide combined with metformin versus dapagliflozin combined with metformin in patients with T2DM and subclinical carotid atherosclerotic disease. Full details regarding the study selection criteria, procedures, and assessment of brachial artery function are published elsewhere [ 18 ] and described in depth in the Additional file 1 . Briefly, eligible patients were 40–70 years of age.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample size calculations have been published elsewhere [ 18 ]. Briefly, the two study endpoints equally split an alpha level at the bilateral α = 0.025.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is a pre-specified analysis of the ADDENDA-BHS2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT 02919345). Methods and baseline characteristics have been published elsewhere [ 11 ]. Briefly, ADDENDA-BHS2 was a randomized, single-center, open, active-controlled, phase-4 trial that compared dapagliflozin versus glibenclamide for 12 weeks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomization was performed in a 1:1 ratio for dapagliflozin 10 mg/day or glibenclamide 5 mg/day on top of metformin for 12 weeks of intervention. Eligible volunteers received a 30-day supply of medications according to a previously published protocol [ 11 ]. Anthropometric evaluation performed by the investigators was performed within 2 weeks prior to the randomization visit and up to 2 weeks after the last visit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter, surrogate markers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation, such as adhesion molecule 1, endothelial nitric oxide synthase and high-sensitivity CRP, decreased with dapagliflozin therapy, and FMD correlated negatively with HbA1c[ 75 ]. Assessment of the Dapagliflozin Effect on Diabetic Endothelial Dysfunction of the Brachial Artery (ADDENDABHS2) trial, in which patients with poor glycemic control were randomized to receive either dapagliflozin or glibenclamide, shed more light on the effect of this agent[ 76 ].…”
Section: Functional Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%