2002
DOI: 10.1080/01431160110040026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of crop damage using space remote sensing and GIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Peters et al 2000;Silleos et al 2002;de Leeuw et al 2014) due to various factors. Data sources include satellite imagery, cameras flown on light aircraft or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), and handheld (proximal) sensors.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peters et al 2000;Silleos et al 2002;de Leeuw et al 2014) due to various factors. Data sources include satellite imagery, cameras flown on light aircraft or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), and handheld (proximal) sensors.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years much attention has been paid on monitoring phenological changes and classification of different crop types using remote sensing observations (Bouvet and Le Toan, 2009;Hoekman, 2003;Liu et al, 2013;Juan M. Lopez-Sanchez et al, 2011). Issues like recognizing growth behaviour, cultivation problems and crop yield estimation have been worked by different researchers (Dhar et al, 2009;Ferencz et al, 2004;Silleos et al, 2002). Among different sensor data, radar remote sensing with its reliable and frequent imaging capability all-weather functionality, sensitivity to target geometrical structure and orientation, has enhanced further our capabilities for agricultural monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, land surface temperature (LST) or near-ground air temperature retrieved from thermal infrared band(s) directly or indirectly, may not be readily available when frost occurs, because of the limitation of the revisit cycle or dense cloud cover. Alternatively, most studies employ various vegetation indices (VIs) derived from airborne or spaceborne sensors as the indicators of freeze injury, among which the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) is particularly widely applied (Silleos et al, 2002;Feng et al, 2009;Tan et al, 2009;Currit and St. Clair, 2010). The affected scope and degree of the freeze injury can be estimated using the difference of VI before and after freeze, or the deviation from a normal baseline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The freeze injury issues have been intensively studied using remote sensing approach for forests (Olthof et al, 2004;King et al, 2005;Currit and St. Clair, 2010), and also crops, e.g., winter wheat (Silleos et al, 2002;Feng et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2012) and sugar-cane (Tan et al, 2009). The daily minimum temperature is definitely the foremost factor for the occurrence of freeze injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%