1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02213374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of creativity: Resolving a mid-life crisis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that although divergent thinking tests (e.g., TTCT) enjoy well-known reputation in creativity research, several researchers have questioned the validity of this kind of test (e.g., Houtz & Krug, 1995;Runco, 2006). The major deficiency is grounded in the lack of validity.…”
Section: Journal Of Social Science Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that although divergent thinking tests (e.g., TTCT) enjoy well-known reputation in creativity research, several researchers have questioned the validity of this kind of test (e.g., Houtz & Krug, 1995;Runco, 2006). The major deficiency is grounded in the lack of validity.…”
Section: Journal Of Social Science Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have found that the four dimensions of personality as measured by the MBTI are closely related to creativity (Houtz & Krug, 1995;Isaksen et al, 2003;Myers & McCaulley, 1985). However, using path analyses, Houtz et al (2003) found that only the MBTI's intuitiveness dimension exhibited a clear causal link with creative self-perception on a par with that of the Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI; Kirton, 1976).…”
Section: Jung's Theory Of Personality Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His findings suggested that innovation was either being measured in terms of creativity or divergent thinking (i.e., creativity tests often focused directly on divergent thinking; Houtz & Krug, 1995). Other creativity tests measure different aspects of divergent thinking, such as flexibility (Torrance, 1963), fluency (Houtz & Krug, 1995;Torrance, 1963), and originality (Houtz & Krug, 1995;Torrance, 1963), or focus on the environment for promoting innovation or focus on the end or implementation of the product (convergent thinking). For example, measures in Radosevic and Mickiewicz (2003) evaluated the success of innovation programs in terms of financial outputs, such as sales of a product or an increase in profits during or after the introduction of an innovation course or program.…”
Section: Thesis Creativity and Innovation: A Comparative Analysis Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%