Assessment of COVID-19 pandemic responses in African countries: thematic synthesis of WHO intra-action review reports

Abstract

ObjectivesWe conducted a review of intra-action review (IAR) reports of the national response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa. We highlight best practices and challenges and offer perspectives for the future.DesignA thematic analysis across 10 preparedness and response domains, namely, governance, leadership, and coordination; planning and monitoring; risk communication and community engagement; surveillance, rapid response, and case investigation; infection prevention and control; case management; screening and monitoring at points of entry; national laboratory system; logistics and supply chain management; and maintaining essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic.SettingAll countries in the WHO African Region were eligible for inclusion in the study. National IAR reports submitted by March 2021 were analysed.ResultsWe retrieved IAR reports from 18 African countries. The COVID-19 pandemic response in African countries has relied on many existing response systems such as laboratory systems, surveillance systems for previous outbreaks of highly infectious diseases and a logistics management information system. These best practices were backed by strong political will. The key challenges included low public confidence in governments, inadequate adherence to infection prevention and control measures, shortages of personal protective equipment, inadequate laboratory capacity, inadequate contact tracing, poor supply chain and logistics management systems, and lack of training of key personnel at national and subnational levels.ConclusionThese findings suggest that African countries’ response to the COVID-19 pandemic was prompt and may have contributed to the lower cases and deaths in the region compared with countries in other regions. The IARs demonstrate that many technical areas still require immediate improvement to guide decisions in subsequent waves or future outbreaks.

Re-Starting the Cruise Sector during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Greece: Assessing Effectiveness of Port Contingency Planning

“…Country-led IARs have been conducted globally to assess several COVID-19 response domains (pillars) simultaneously, including a pillar for points of entry (PoE) [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]. IARs have also been implemented to focus specifically on countries’ COVID-19 response at PoE [ 39 , 40 ], with some IARs for ports and airports carried out under the European HEALTHY GATEWAYS framework [ 41 , 42 ].…”

“…Communication challenges observed during the IAR reflect results of a study under the EU SHIPSAN project examining passenger ship hygiene inspection practices, where a lack of port-to-port communication was identified [ 48 ]. In a review of reports from COVID-19 IARs conducted in WHO African region countries until March 2021, the importance of appropriate information exchange between neighboring countries in the PoE context emerged [ 38 ]. COVID-19 revealed the importance of timely communication between ports in a cruise ship’s itinerary, including European and non-European countries.…”

Transitioning the COVID-19 response in the WHO African region: a proposed framework for rethinking and rebuilding health systems

“…The deficiency in the clinical case management (CM) capacities, in terms of unskilled staff, oxygen deficiency, therapeutics and treatments and medical equipment, was observed in the region at the onset of the pandemic. 25 To address the challenges, WHO, with the help of partners, has worked on the establishment of a regional stockpile of oxygen concentrators (800), oxygen cylinders (3800) and pulse oximeters (595) that are ready to be shipped to countries for urgent need. Regionally, more than 60 000 healthcare workers (HCWs) have been trained to manage critical and severe patients and the indications of rational oxygen use and other therapeutics and monitoring home-based and isolation care (HBIC).…”

Framing the future of the COVID-19 response operations in 2022 in the WHO African region

“…To address the challenge, WHO and partners invested in training HCWs and 24 months into the pandemic had trained more than 12,000 medical officers and 44,000 nurses on COVID-19 treatment, surveillance standard operating procedures (SOPs), tools and guidelines across the region [ 26 ]. With the constant changing treatment protocols, many countries constantly updated their national treatment and therapeutics guidelines to include novel recommended COVID-19 therapeutics that arose as research developed in that area with the support of partners, as shown from the thematic analysis of WHO intra-action review reports [ 27 ]. Over the past two years, international emergency medical teams (EMTs) have been deployed to 25 countries where more than 6,000 HCWs have been trained [ 26 ].…”