2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.07.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of corrosion inhibitive behavior of 2-aminothiophenol derivatives on carbon steel in 1M HCl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhibition process of 4ATF was suggested as a result of a blocking mechanism of the actives sites on surface, which may happen by chemical and/or physical adsorption. Similar results for 2-aminothiophenol derivatives on carbon steel in 1 M HCl were reported in the study of Kabel et al (2015). They investigated the inhibition effect of three newly synthesized 2-aminothiophenol derivatives as N-(2-carboxyethylthiophenyl)-β-Alanine (I), ethoxylated β-Alanine N-[o-[(2-carboxyethyl)thio]phenyl] (II) and ethoxylated β-Alanine N-[o-[(2-amidoethyl)thio]phenyl] (III) and they declared that 0.242, 0.208 and 0.098 mA cm −2 corrosion current density values for 10 mM inhibitor (I, II and III) containing solutions, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inhibition process of 4ATF was suggested as a result of a blocking mechanism of the actives sites on surface, which may happen by chemical and/or physical adsorption. Similar results for 2-aminothiophenol derivatives on carbon steel in 1 M HCl were reported in the study of Kabel et al (2015). They investigated the inhibition effect of three newly synthesized 2-aminothiophenol derivatives as N-(2-carboxyethylthiophenyl)-β-Alanine (I), ethoxylated β-Alanine N-[o-[(2-carboxyethyl)thio]phenyl] (II) and ethoxylated β-Alanine N-[o-[(2-amidoethyl)thio]phenyl] (III) and they declared that 0.242, 0.208 and 0.098 mA cm −2 corrosion current density values for 10 mM inhibitor (I, II and III) containing solutions, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…By and large, adsorption of inhibitor molecules on the MS surface depends on: the surface charge of the metal and the nature, the adsorption mode, type of electrolyte solution and chemical structure (Ismayilov et al , 2012; Abbasov et al , 2013). The inhibition efficiency of inhibitors increases in the order of: O < N < S < P (Pardave et al , 2012; Salarvand et al , 2017; Kabel et al , 2015; Ebrahimzadeh et al , 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increase in the R ct value with inhibitors confirms the inhibiting effect of I 1 and I 2 . As R ct value increases, the CPE value was decreased due to the increase in surface coverage of the inhibitors reducing the dissolution of the metal surface . At the same time, increase in concentration of inhibitors, decrease C dl value and it could be concluded that the double layer is formed between the charged mild steel surface and solution and it acts as a capacitor .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The important related electrochemical parameters, such as corrosion current density (I corr , mA/cm 2 ), anodic Tafel slope (b a , mV/dec), and cathodic Tafel slope (b c , mV/dec) were obtained by extrapolation of Tafel lines at the corrosion potential (E corr , mV) and are presented in Table 6. The surface coverage (O -) and inhibition efficiency (g Tafel , %) were calculated from the following equations [55]: …”
Section: Polarization Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%