2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2018.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of conventional PCR and real-time PCR compared to the gold standard method for screening Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to culture which is a considered as a gold standard tool, 77.3% more detection capacity was offered by PCR [21]. In agreement to our study, other studies in Brazil (3.8% vs. 29.2%) [22], Iran (27.7% vs. 43.8%) [23], China (0% vs. 50.7%) [24] and Jimma, Ethiopia (3% vs. 33%) were also indicated the sensitivity of PCR over culture [25]. � Normal values: WCC = 0-5/μL, CSF Protein = 40-100 mg/dl and CSF glucose = 40-75 mg/dl [13,14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast to culture which is a considered as a gold standard tool, 77.3% more detection capacity was offered by PCR [21]. In agreement to our study, other studies in Brazil (3.8% vs. 29.2%) [22], Iran (27.7% vs. 43.8%) [23], China (0% vs. 50.7%) [24] and Jimma, Ethiopia (3% vs. 33%) were also indicated the sensitivity of PCR over culture [25]. � Normal values: WCC = 0-5/μL, CSF Protein = 40-100 mg/dl and CSF glucose = 40-75 mg/dl [13,14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Currently, bacterial culture is the gold standard for the identification of GBS infection, but it is timeconsuming with limited sensitivity and vulnerable to interference [18]. Also, real-time qPCR requires expensive equipment and only quantifies nucleic acid relatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, a bacterial culture is still a gold standard method to identify GBS infection, but it is timeconsuming with limited sensitivity and vulnerable to interference [17] . Also, real-time qPCR requires expensive equipment and only quantifies nucleic acid relatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%