2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2011.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of control of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Introduced in 1995 [8], the DAS28 has a cut-off value of <2.6 defining RA remission [9] but does not include a disability assessment. Moreover, real-life practice clearly shows that multiple joints can remain swollen or tender, and that pain can persist even when patients meet the remission cut-off score [10]. It is interesting to note that a recent large-scale observational study found disparities between the reduction in disease activity as expressed by DAS28 scores and the progression of disability [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduced in 1995 [8], the DAS28 has a cut-off value of <2.6 defining RA remission [9] but does not include a disability assessment. Moreover, real-life practice clearly shows that multiple joints can remain swollen or tender, and that pain can persist even when patients meet the remission cut-off score [10]. It is interesting to note that a recent large-scale observational study found disparities between the reduction in disease activity as expressed by DAS28 scores and the progression of disability [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the BeST study, there was an association between patients who received more aggressive treatment strategies and improvements in functional outcomes and radiographic progression [30]. However in current clinical practice, documentation of QMs may be poor, our tools to precisely review charts to collect QM data may not be optimal, and there can be a disconnect between clinical remission and radiographic progression—erosions can still develop in patients who are in remission [31]. Thus at present, disease activity assessment may be one of the most optimal outcome measures for RA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various definitions of disease activity have thus far been proposed, including ACR criteria, disease activity score (DAS), DAS28, simplified disease activity index (SDAI) and clinical disease activity index (CDAI). The core set for ACR response criteria include seven clinical end points: swollen joint count, tender joint count, physician's assessment of disease activity, patient's assessment of disease activity, patient's assessment of pain, and patient's assessment of physical function, and levels of an acute-phase reactant (either the CRP level or the ESR) [38]. An ACR20 response is defined as at least 20% improvement in both the tender joint count and the swollen joint count and at least 20% improvement in three of the five other core set measures.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Disease Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although DAS < 1.6 was reported to correlate well with ACR remission criteria, and DAS28 < 2.6 with DAS < 1.6 [40-42], the implication of omitting foot and ankle joint in DAS28 is not well known. In our previous study, significant number of patients in clinical remission defined by DAS28 < 2.6 had foot metatarsophalangeal (MTP) and ankle involvement with some patients even showing isolated foot or MTP joint involvement without evidence of disease activity in other joints [38]. Among those who had radiograph available for examination, 30% showed radiographic joint damage at the time of clinical remission.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Disease Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%