2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis and preoperative localization of insulinoma

Lichun An,
Wenxiu Li,
Ke-chun Yao
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Four previous canine reports have described the use of dual-phase computed tomographic angiography for diagnosis of insulinomas. 10,11 Among them, three of the four nodules were markedly hyperattenuating compared with the normal pancreas during the arterial phase, whereas one was hypoattenuating during the arterial phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 Four previous canine reports have described the use of dual-phase computed tomographic angiography for diagnosis of insulinomas. 10,11 Among them, three of the four nodules were markedly hyperattenuating compared with the normal pancreas during the arterial phase, whereas one was hypoattenuating during the arterial phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33][34][35] The detection rate of pancreatic insulinoma improves from 24% to 89% with CEUS. 20 The criteria for inclusion in the current study required that a nodule be identified with conventional ultrasonography, therefore it remains unknown whether contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can improve the detection rate of pancreatic insulinoma in dogs. However, the observation that all lesions in the present study became more clearly demarcated following CEUS suggests that pancreatic insulinoma conspicuity may be improved using this technique in dogs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Also contrast-enhanced ultrasound may work as an effective and non-invasive localization modality and presents the advantage of being inexpensive. 16 If a pre-operative invasive radiological investigation is needed, the choice of angiography with hepatic venous sampling after calcium stimulation versus endoscopic ultrasound is driven by the availability of the procedure and the experience of the investigators. No studies aiming to compare the sensitivity of these two techniques for insulinoma localization have been carried out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major drawbacks include its dependence on operator expertise, difficulties in evaluating intra-abdominal structures in the obese patient and declining sensitivity with small diameter lesions (<2 cm) and with tumors located in the tail of the pancreas. 16,17 However, in certain high-volume centers detection by contrast-enhanced transabdominal US has been reported to be comparable to detection by conventional CT. 18 CT is the most commonly used non-invasive preoperative localization test. Contrast enhancement is routinely used and insulinomas are usually visualized as rounded, well-defined lesions.…”
Section: Localization Of the Tumormentioning
confidence: 99%