2019
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Construction Workers’ Labor Intensity Based on Wearable Smartphone System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the overall classification accuracy of 98.13% achieved for nine uncontrolled activity datasets shows that the model is capable of recognizing activity with different intensities, which is one of the limitations of current construction activity recognition models [ 10 , 16 , 20 ]. The accuracy of proposed activity recognition models using EMG and IMU forearm data (Accuracy EMG + IMU = 98.13%) is higher than previously published construction activity recognition models such as carpentry activities (91%) [ 14 ], fall identification (94%) [ 15 ], manual material handling activities (90.74%) [ 11 ], ironworker activities (94.83%, 92.98%) [ 9 , 17 ], and bricklaying activities (88.1%) [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the overall classification accuracy of 98.13% achieved for nine uncontrolled activity datasets shows that the model is capable of recognizing activity with different intensities, which is one of the limitations of current construction activity recognition models [ 10 , 16 , 20 ]. The accuracy of proposed activity recognition models using EMG and IMU forearm data (Accuracy EMG + IMU = 98.13%) is higher than previously published construction activity recognition models such as carpentry activities (91%) [ 14 ], fall identification (94%) [ 15 ], manual material handling activities (90.74%) [ 11 ], ironworker activities (94.83%, 92.98%) [ 9 , 17 ], and bricklaying activities (88.1%) [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Lim, et al [ 15 ] and Akhavian and Behzadan [ 16 ] have developed artificial neural network (ANN) based models for identifying falls and manual material handling activities with an accuracy of 94% and 90.74% using the smartphone placed in the hip pocket and upper arm respectively. The ironwork activities recognition models developed by [ 17 ] and [ 9 ] using support vector machine (SVM) and decision trees (DT) were able to recognize activities with 94.83% and 92.98% accuracy. Even though these smartphone sensors-based models have achieved considerable accuracy, there are practical implementation challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closely-related studies have explored automating the detection of diverse awkward postures through the use of raw sensor output from both wearable IMUs [ 5 , 6 , 7 ] and smart-device built-in IMUs [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Existing studies mainly focus on optimizing the models for analyzing motion data and accurately detecting targeted human activities/postures [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, sensor technology begins to gradually emerge in the field of construction supervision. These technology include RFID (radio frequency identification) technology for material management [8], Smartphone-based worker efficiency management technology [9], location monitoring system based on ultrawide band technology, RF (radio frequency) remote sensing, WIFI (wireless fidelity) [10,11,12], and tracking workers’ paths relying on video streams [13,14]. Although each assistive technology has its own advantages, there is still room for improvement in the sensing technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%