2018
DOI: 10.5335/rsaee.v15i2.7852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Concrete Anisotropy in Relation to the Direction of Casting

Abstract: In numerical predictions of both static and dynamic response of concrete structures, the usual assumption of global isotropic behavior is usually accepted, constituting standard practice in structural analysis and design. It has been recognized, however, that in situ concrete compressive strength of drilled cores in the direction normal to the direction of casting is somewhat smaller than the strength in the vertical direction. Since the consideration of this factor may reduce model error in numerical schemes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be seen that failure often occurs due to low tensile strength normal to a vertical plane in the central portion of the cylinder, thus reducing the influence of friction at the end plattens. The strength of sample S3 is roughly 20% smaller than the mean strength measured in conventional tests, result that suggests a strength reduction larger than that observed in cubic samples by Kosteski et al 7 , but still within the expected range.…”
Section: Compression Testsmentioning
confidence: 44%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It may be seen that failure often occurs due to low tensile strength normal to a vertical plane in the central portion of the cylinder, thus reducing the influence of friction at the end plattens. The strength of sample S3 is roughly 20% smaller than the mean strength measured in conventional tests, result that suggests a strength reduction larger than that observed in cubic samples by Kosteski et al 7 , but still within the expected range.…”
Section: Compression Testsmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…These tests confirm that both the unconfined compressive strength as well as the indirect tensile strength determined on cylindrical samples are perceptibly influenced by the angle between the sample axis and the vertical orientation during casting. In connection with compression tests on cubic samples, the results of Kosteski et al 7 lead to evidence concerning the fact that the strength measured in the direction of casting, exceeds the strength measured in a direction orthogonal to the direction of casting, coincident with extensive results reported by Yi et al 8 . These authors, who continued earlier studies of Kim and Eo 9 , were concerned mainly with size and shape effects of samples used in different codes to assess fc', the compressive strength of concrete measured in standard cylindrical samples and somehow overlooked the fact that concrete always presents a perceptible degree of anisotropy, not only testing samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Portanto, o presente estudo visa avaliar a anisotropia do concreto com base nas referências citadas, utilizando corpos de prova cúbicos, obtidos através de três traços de concreto, também avaliar a interferência das condições de contorno impostas no ensaio de compressão axial, visto que o atrito entre espécime e máquina de ensaio possui grande influência na resistência final do concreto. Em KOSTESKI et al [15] foram utilizados corpos de prova cúbicos para estudar o efeito da direção do lançamento do concreto na resistência a compressão axial, da mesma forma que vários outros trabalhos anteriores. Já em KOSTESKI, MARAN-GON e RIERA [27] foi estudado o mesmo efeito utilizando corpos de prova cilíndricos.…”
Section: Figuraunclassified