Assessment of Compliance with PEFC Forest Certification Indicators with Remote Sensing

Abstract

Abstract:The majority of Finnish forests (95%) are certified by the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC). It is a worldwide leading forest certification scheme. The aim of this study is to analyze the Finnish National Standard of PEFC certification and identify the indicators that can be reliably estimated with remote sensing (RS) techniques. The retrieved data are further verified with a chosen geographical information system (GIS) application. The rapid increase in certified areas globally has created a certain level of mistrust that makes the evaluation by certification bodies (CB) questionable. Firstly, the area of the field audit is limited, and the verification results are based on sampling techniques. Secondly, the evaluation of the indicators of sustainable forest management (SFM) is based on auditor expertise and thus is prone to bias. Thirdly, the actual condition of large forest stands in Eastern and Northern Finland are not easy to determine and verify. Thus, PEFC certification in Finland, in particular, faces numerous challenges in regard to the quality of field assessment due to the intensive forest management model with a high number of annual felling sites. At the same time, small scale and scattered harvesting sites are difficult to assess. Our proposed approach combined with remote assessment reliably verified 18% of the standard and could substantially reduce the costs associated with field audits in Finland. The results from our verification analysis are spatially explicit and geographically referenced and can be published in open access portals for interested parties. Moreover, it provides improved transparency in field assessments for the PEFC certification. The novel approach proposed here requires further investigation at larger scales (e.g., national level).

Implementation of voluntary verification of sustainability for solid biomass—a case study from Denmark

“…ENVIVA, [41] and DRAX [25]. Such work is also ongoing in relation to the EUTR [97], as well as work to explore verification of sustainability indicators with spatial data [72]. This might be crucial to verify sustainability for uncertified areas, e.g.…”

Evaluation, Analysis and Perception of Sustainable Forest Management Through the Lens of the PEFC Forest Certification Using Two Case Studies in Sicily

“…According to data reported by the National Forest Inventory, Finnish forests are mostly privately owned, with an area under planning 67% of the whole, while all the public forests have management plans, (State of Finland's Forests 2012). The PEFC scheme was preferred because it is cheaper from an economic point of view, more suitable for small forest owners, and offers the possibility of group certification for small forest areas, (Lopatin et al 2016).…”

Theory-of-Change Development for the Evaluation of Forest Stewardship Council Certification of Sustained Timber Yields from Natural Forests in Indonesia

“…Field verification is time-consuming and therefore expensive, but is critical for assessment of logging damage, wood waste, and compliance with harvesting guidelines, as well as to determine whether any required treatments were indeed applied and were effective (e.g., skid trail drainage, road bed stabilization, or future crop tree liberation from lianas). Deforestation assessments can also be carried out on the ground, but conformance assessment bodies and their auditors might instead utilize the increasingly available remote sensing technology coupled with geographical information systems for this and several other indicators [53]. Our ToC also stresses that the motivational context for worker performance should be understood to evaluate the existence and effectiveness of an enabling environment for STY-favoring decisions.…”