2014
DOI: 10.3390/rs6098220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Complex Masonry Structures with GPR Compared to Other Non-Destructive Testing Studies

Abstract: Columns are one of the most usual supporting structures in a large number of cultural heritage buildings. However, it is difficult to obtain accurate information about their inner structure. Non-destructive testing (NDT) methodologies are usually applied, but results depend on the complexity of the column. Non-flat external surfaces and unknown and irregular internal materials complicate the interpretation of data. This work presents the study of one column by using ground-penetrating radar (GPR) combined with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
37
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding CH assets, GPR is useful for investigating deformation of hollow piers due to mechanical stress [3], and for studying the signal reflected by objects inside structures such as bridges or viaducts [4][5][6][7]. Moreover, it allows us to analyze the state of conservation of ancient buildings from historical, archaeological, and structural points of view [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding CH assets, GPR is useful for investigating deformation of hollow piers due to mechanical stress [3], and for studying the signal reflected by objects inside structures such as bridges or viaducts [4][5][6][7]. Moreover, it allows us to analyze the state of conservation of ancient buildings from historical, archaeological, and structural points of view [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Santos‐Assunçao et al . ), humidity gradients that can be critical to the stability of a structure (Plati and Loizos ), and hidden features such as doors in the wall and so on. Non‐invasive investigations offer also information on the history of the monuments, possible architectural changes and changes of use as well as restoration works that occurred in the past (e.g., Geraldi, Loperte and Dolce ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combination of GPR and seismic survey techniques or ultrasonic testing in cultural heritage assessment was successfully utilized to select the zones or the structural elements where further studies might be required. Both techniques were effectively managed to detect damage in possible damaged areas . They were also successfully combined to study the arrangement of materials in constructive elements and in the detection of wet zones .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%