2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-015-2694-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Cognitive Outcome Measures in Teenagers with 15q13.3 Microdeletion Syndrome

Abstract: 15q13.3 microdeletion syndrome causes a spectrum of cognitive disorders, including intellectual disability and autism. We aimed to determine if any or all of three cognitive tests (the KiTAP, CogState, and Stanford-Binet) are suitable for assessment of cognitive function in affected individuals. These three tests were administered to ten individuals with 15q13.3 microdeletion syndrome (14–18 years of age), and the results were analyzed to determine feasibility of use, potential for improvement, and internal co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with previously published data on individuals with 15q13.3 microdeletion syndrome, showing deficits in standardized cognitive and achievement tests, such as the Differential Ability Scales and impaired performance on cognitive outcome measures, such as the CogState and KiTAP tests (Crutcher et al, 2016 ; Ziats et al, 2016 ). The tasks administered in those tests, rather than purely auditory, required responses based upon both auditory and visual stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is in line with previously published data on individuals with 15q13.3 microdeletion syndrome, showing deficits in standardized cognitive and achievement tests, such as the Differential Ability Scales and impaired performance on cognitive outcome measures, such as the CogState and KiTAP tests (Crutcher et al, 2016 ; Ziats et al, 2016 ). The tasks administered in those tests, rather than purely auditory, required responses based upon both auditory and visual stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Some papers presented studies with populations whose clinical state of ID or ASD was associated to different diagnoses, including diverse genetic syndromes (Borgwardt et al, 2015;Crutcher et al, 2016;Jauregi et al, 2007;Merrill et al, 2014;Rose et al, 2013;Scott & Holfelder, 2015;Trezise et al, 2008;Vinck et al, 2007). A few of the syndromes related to ID or ASD, such as the Rett Syndrome, add testing challenges concerning the significant motor and language impairment in these populations (Rose et al, 2013).…”
Section: Category 1: Tests Attention Abilities Measured and Populatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of stimuli was considered a crucial element to foster test´s attractiveness. The selected stimuli included: animal figures (Foster-Owens, 2016; Jiang et al, 2014); figures of objects or symbols (De Vries & Watson, 2008;Garretson et al, 1990, Huguenin, 1997Keehn et al, 2010;Pascualvaca et al, 1998;Rose et al, 2009); fairy tales characters (Aman et al, 1993); and tasks situated in children stories (Crutcher et al, 2016;Foster-Owens, 2016;Knox et al, 2012). Some of the criteria identified for the choice of stimuli included familiarity, emotional neutrality, and level of complexity (Garretson et al, 1990).…”
Section: Category 2: Procedures and Adaptations In The Testing Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To measure cognitive function, the Cogstate Computerized Test Battery ( 2016 ) was included in the JAKE Task Battery and evaluated in this study. Involved are tests of information processing speed and fine motor skills, visual attention, visual recognition memory, working memory, and emotion processing, to assess ASD-associated neurocognitive deficits (Baron-Cohen et al, 2001 ; Surowiecki et al, 2002 ; Bavin et al, 2005 ; Mollica et al, 2005 ; Crutcher et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%