2021
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Clinicopathological Characteristics and Development of an Individualized Prognostic Model for Patients With Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach

Abstract: IMPORTANCEFew studies have examined the clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses of patients with hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS). OBJECTIVE To explore the clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses of patients with HAS and develop a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prognostic study involved a retrospective analysis of data from 315 patients who received a diagnosis of primary HAS between April 1, 2004, and December 31, 2019, at 14 c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our novel nomogram has shown remarkable e ciency in predicting CSS among patients with HAC. A different nomogram produced with 315 patients who had primary HAS demonstrated that problematic node category 3, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels of 5 ng/mL or greater, and perineural invasion were independent risk factors for a worse survival outcome (Lin et al, 2021). However, this study did not nd any independent prognostic factors that are similar to our research.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Our novel nomogram has shown remarkable e ciency in predicting CSS among patients with HAC. A different nomogram produced with 315 patients who had primary HAS demonstrated that problematic node category 3, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels of 5 ng/mL or greater, and perineural invasion were independent risk factors for a worse survival outcome (Lin et al, 2021). However, this study did not nd any independent prognostic factors that are similar to our research.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Nomogram is a comprehensive assessment tool that integrates multiple risk factors to predict outcomes. It has been demonstrated to possess superior prognostic prediction ability compared to traditional TNM staging in various types of tumors ( 28 - 30 ). Furthermore, nomograms have been successfully employed to predict the subset of patients who may derive benefits from specific therapies ( 31 , 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common clinical features in patients with TETs, such as age, GTF2I mutation, gender, Masaoka stage, and histologic type, were used to construct a nomogram using the R package “rms” and calibrate function. The time-dependent calibration curves from the R package “rms” were used to determine prediction accuracy of the nomogram [ 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%