2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12647-021-00431-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on Precipitation and Temperature in the Ghataprabha Sub-basin Using CMIP5 Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The additive approach takes the arithmetic difference between the modeled historical and modeled future data sets and then adds the difference to the observed data set, in contrast to the multiplicative approach, which takes the ratio of future simulated values and historical simulated values and multiplies it with the observed historical values. The additive approach is expected to produce a better estimate for absolute change in any variable, while the multiplicative approach does so for the relative change in values of any variable [56]. Since the research aims to provide an insight on the relative change in flooding peaks over the years, this study opts for the multiplicative approach of the CFM.…”
Section: Quantification Of Future Design Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additive approach takes the arithmetic difference between the modeled historical and modeled future data sets and then adds the difference to the observed data set, in contrast to the multiplicative approach, which takes the ratio of future simulated values and historical simulated values and multiplies it with the observed historical values. The additive approach is expected to produce a better estimate for absolute change in any variable, while the multiplicative approach does so for the relative change in values of any variable [56]. Since the research aims to provide an insight on the relative change in flooding peaks over the years, this study opts for the multiplicative approach of the CFM.…”
Section: Quantification Of Future Design Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2013). Recently, Reddy et al (2021) studied the performance of ten CMIP5, GCM models and Change Factor downscaling method over the Ghataprabha river sub-basin, India, and for the current study the selected GCM models were based on their results. Particularly, ve GCMs (BCC-CSM1.1 (m), MIROC-ESM, MIROC-ESM-CHEM, MIROC5, and NorESM1-M), which are relatively well performing and have daily simulations under four future scenarios , that is a moderate (RCP 4.5) and a high future (RCP 8.5)scenario are considered for the two future time slices 2010-2039 and 2070-2099 and 1961-1990 as a control period.…”
Section: Climate Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study attempts to deliver the information about the future climate change impacts on the climate variables like precipitation, maximum and minimum in the Ghataprabha sub-basin, under different climate change scenarios. Reddy et al (2021) projected an increasing trend in the annual mean rainfall and temperature under future scenarios during the study period.The study also incorporates ensembling of GCMs as the climatic models developed by various organizations across the globe failed miserably in capturing the reality as they ignore the fundamental and intrinsic processes which dominate the climate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%