Assessment of cisgenic bread wheat lines carrying class I chitinase gene to leaf rust

Maltseva, Elina R.; Iskakova, Gulnur; Rsaliyev, Aralbek; Skiba, Yuriy A.; Naizabaeva, D.; Ismagulova, Gulnara; Ismagul, Ainur; Eliby, Serik

doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.06.264

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Homozygous cisgenic lines were obtained by segregation at the 4 th generation (Gadaleta et al, 2008b;Gadaleta et al, 2008c). Moreover, cisgenic lines of wheat carrying a class I chitinase gene displayed partial resistance to fungal pathogens (Maltseva et al, 2018). Holme et al (2012b) used a barley phytase gene (HvPAPhy_a) and the cotransformation strategy to test cisgenic feasibility in barley, obtaining lines with increased phytase activity (Holme et al, 2012a).…”

Section: Stress-tolerant Cisgenic Cropsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cisgenic approaches were adopted in potato, apple, grapevine, melon, wheat, barley, poplar, rice and strawberry (Benjamin et al ., 2009 ; Dhekney et al ., 2011 ; Gadaleta et al ., 2008a ; Han et al ., 2011 ; Haverkort et al ., 2016 ; Holme et al ., 2012a ; Krens et al ., 2015 ; Maltseva et al ., 2018 ; Tamang, 2018 ). In most cases, the aim was to increase pathogen resistance, although some studies were focused on quality trait improvement.…”

Section: Cisgenesis: Approaches and Potentials In Plant Protectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Homozygous cisgenic lines were obtained by segregation at the 4 th generation (Gadaleta et al ., 2008b ; Gadaleta et al ., 2008c ). Moreover, cisgenic lines of wheat carrying a class I chitinase gene displayed partial resistance to fungal pathogens (Maltseva et al ., 2018 ). Holme et al .…”

Section: Cisgenesis: Approaches and Potentials In Plant Protectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Novel and emerging biotechnological crop protection approaches

Giudice

Moffa

Varotto

et al. 2021

Plant Biotechnology Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditional breeding or genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have for a long time been the sole approaches to effectively cope with biotic and abiotic stresses and implement the quality traits of crops. However, emerging diseases as well as unpredictable climate changes affecting agriculture over the entire globe force scientists to find alternative solutions required to quickly overcome seasonal crises. In this review, we first focus on cisgenesis and genome editing as challenging biotechnological approaches for breeding crops more tolerant to biotic and abiotic stresses. In addition, we take into consideration a toolbox of new techniques based on applications of RNA interference and epigenome modifications, which can be adopted for improving plant resilience. Recent advances in these biotechnological applications are mainly reported for non-model plants and woody crops in particular. Indeed, the characterization of RNAi machinery in plants is fundamental to transform available information into biologically or biotechnologically applicable knowledge. Finally, here we discuss how these innovative and environmentally friendly techniques combined with traditional breeding can sustain a modern agriculture and be of potential contribution to climate change mitigation.

show abstract