2002
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.00049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC): A Practical Tool to Measure Quality Improvement

Abstract: Objective. To describe initial testing of the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC), a practical quality-improvement tool to help organizations evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of their delivery of care for chronic illness in six areas: community linkages, self-management support, decision support, delivery system design, information systems, and organization of care.Data Sources.(1) Pre-post, self-report ACIC data from organizational teams enrolled in 13-month quality-improvement collaboratives focus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
337
1
25

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 333 publications
(377 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
6
337
1
25
Order By: Relevance
“…Implementation of the CCM was measured by the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) Instrument. The ACIC is a previously validated instrument 10 , which evaluates success in implementing 7 key components of the CCM-delivery system design, decision support, clinical information systems, patient self-management, integration, healthcare system organization, and community linkages. At the beginning, in the middle and at the end of the initiatives, the residencies used the ACIC to self-evaluate implementation and application of each of the components of the CCM.…”
Section: Study Of the Intervention And Methods Of Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Implementation of the CCM was measured by the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) Instrument. The ACIC is a previously validated instrument 10 , which evaluates success in implementing 7 key components of the CCM-delivery system design, decision support, clinical information systems, patient self-management, integration, healthcare system organization, and community linkages. At the beginning, in the middle and at the end of the initiatives, the residencies used the ACIC to self-evaluate implementation and application of each of the components of the CCM.…”
Section: Study Of the Intervention And Methods Of Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initiatives employed the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Breakthrough Series Collaborative strategy [9][10][11] to learn and implement the CCM. Over the course of the Collaboratives, participating residency program teams met together for three, two-day learning sessions, and one all-day virtual web-mediated meeting.…”
Section: Residency Practices and Their Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, as part of the formative evaluation process, in which 6-monthly reports were provided to the project Steering Committee, a range of staff including hospital department managers, community health agency CEOs, care facilitators, nursing staff and patients were regularly interviewed and completed questionnaires that included items related to concepts in the Improving Chronic Illness Care Model (Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and MacColl Institute of Healthcare Innovation) 27 and elements from the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC). 28 A basic cost-saving analysis was conducted to assess the financial implications of the project. Project costs were derived from the expenditure reported in the project budget.…”
Section: Models Of Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This project is known as ABCD (Audit and Best Practice in Chronic Disease), and includes an assessment of the quality of chronic illness care systems across six domains: community resources and policies, health system organisation, self-management support, delivery system design, decision support and clinical information systems (Bonomi et al, 2002), as well as an assessment of the process of care and health outcome measures.…”
Section: Pcds Implementation and Primary Health Carementioning
confidence: 99%