2001
DOI: 10.1207/s15327035ex091&2_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Children's Social Skills: Recent Developments, Best Practices, and New Directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
92
0
16

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
92
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, despite the importance of social comparison data for setting age-appropriate and socially valid criterion for treatment success, relatively few studies have included these measurements (Merrell 2001). When using behavioral observation, it is recommended that participants' behavior be compared to that of typical peers' in the same setting, to establish criteria for a good treatment response.…”
Section: Behavioral Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, despite the importance of social comparison data for setting age-appropriate and socially valid criterion for treatment success, relatively few studies have included these measurements (Merrell 2001). When using behavioral observation, it is recommended that participants' behavior be compared to that of typical peers' in the same setting, to establish criteria for a good treatment response.…”
Section: Behavioral Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rating scales are more likely to be used in clinical settings, but typically consist of broadband psychopathology measures (e.g., Behavior Assessment System for Children; Reynolds and Kamphaus 2004) that include only a limited assessment of social skills, but not peer relationships; Erdley et al 2010). Among assessment tools specific to social skills, the Social Skills Rating Scale (SSRS; Gresham and Elliot 1990; revised version Gresham et al 2011) has been the most popular in terms of recommended usage and citations in the literature (Bracken et al 1994;Crowe et al 2011;Demaray and Ruffalo 1995;Luiselli et al 2005;Merrell 2001;Merrell and Gimpel 1998). However, although the SSRS has been identified as one of the most psychometrically sound instruments (Bracken et al 1994;Demaray and Ruffalo 1995), the factor structure has repeatedly failed to replicate (Fantuzzo et al 1998;Jamyang-Tshering 2004;Manz et al 1999; Van der Oord et al 2005;Whiteside et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past several years, behavior rating scales with ever more substantial psychometric properties have become available to practitioners (Merrell 2001). Behavior rating scales require less time and training on the part of users than behavior observation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%