2002
DOI: 10.1080/09540260220132626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of childhood anxiety

Abstract: Anxiety disorders among children are quite common with prevalence rates estimated at up to 20%. Although somewhat neglected in the past, recent empirical studies have increased our understanding of childhood anxiety significantly. Along with the development of empirically supported treatments, the assessment of anxiety among youth has been refined, with more sophisticated and methodologically sound measures developed and revised within the last decade. In addition, the field has benefited from an increased awa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypothesized correlations between anxiety, depression, PTSD, delinquency, age, and somaticism scores were also observed in the current sample (Bernstein et al, 1997;Essau et al, 2000;Langley et al, 2002;Last et al, 1987;Newman et al, 1996;Nutt et al, 2006) It should also be noted that whilst a potential strength of the study (in terms of minimising missing data and children's understanding of questionnaire items), verbally administering questionnaires via interviewers is a non-standard method for administration of the RCMAS. This is also the case for the Children's Depression Inventory (Short Form), the Child PTSD Checklist, and the Child Behavior Checklist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hypothesized correlations between anxiety, depression, PTSD, delinquency, age, and somaticism scores were also observed in the current sample (Bernstein et al, 1997;Essau et al, 2000;Langley et al, 2002;Last et al, 1987;Newman et al, 1996;Nutt et al, 2006) It should also be noted that whilst a potential strength of the study (in terms of minimising missing data and children's understanding of questionnaire items), verbally administering questionnaires via interviewers is a non-standard method for administration of the RCMAS. This is also the case for the Children's Depression Inventory (Short Form), the Child PTSD Checklist, and the Child Behavior Checklist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Rating scales and their items are generally inflexible, do not allow for probing of answers (Langley et al 2002), and may be vulnerable to misinterpretation. To better understand internalizing symptoms in this population, future studies may consider comparing results of rating scales to those of more indepth structured clinical interviews which allow for probing and clarifications (Boyle et al 1997).…”
Section: Strengths Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the child and adolescent therapist assesses both the child or adolescent and other relevant parties (generally including at least one of the parents) and subsequently amalgamates both reports, even when those reports diverge (e.g., Ollendick and Hovey 2010;Silverman and Ollendick 2008). Information from each assessment method and source is then to be analyzed in order to arrive at a clinical diagnosis with consideration of differential diagnoses (For more information on assessment see Essau and Ollendick 2009;Langley et al 2002;Silverman and Ollendick 2008).…”
Section: Conducting a Thorough Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%