2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11604-015-0504-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of cardiac mass from tagged magnetic resonance images

Abstract: The promising results in this study show the potential of the developed method for evaluating both regional and global heart function from a single set of tMRI images, with associated reduction in scan time and patient discomfort.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To that end, the MR-Tagging sequence is detagged following an homomorphic filtering procedure [14] to improve registration performance. Similar detagging procedures have been reported in [15] for global measures estimation. The proposed dettaging method is described below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…To that end, the MR-Tagging sequence is detagged following an homomorphic filtering procedure [14] to improve registration performance. Similar detagging procedures have been reported in [15] for global measures estimation. The proposed dettaging method is described below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…A previous study from Makram et al investigated the extraction of EF and myocardial mass from tagged images using harmonic filtering of k ‐space. Compared with cine untagged SSFP, a strong correlation of LV mass ( r = 0.97) and moderate correlation with EF were observed ( r = 0.32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have investigated GRE tagged MRI images to evaluate global cardiac mass and volume by employing additional k ‐space and image space processing . These results show good left ventricular (LV) mass correlation between SSFP cine and processed images, yet image quality is inferior to standard SSFP imaging in contrast to noise ratio and temporal resolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this technique is shown to be promising for the assessment of regional deformation, motion quantification techniques are highly affected by the two main error sources, coarse resolution and low SNR, commonly observed in in vivo tagged CMR images. Decrease in image resolution due to the saturation bands generated in the tagged images introduces systematic error due to partial voluming at edges [8,9]. Moreover, change in SNR causes random error which is solved by various regularization techniques implemented in the motion tracking algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%