2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of body mass index in a pediatric population aged 7–17 from Ukraine according to various international criteria–A cross-sectional study

Abstract: Childhood obesity is one of the most serious public health problems. The prevalence of obesity among children is increasing and may negatively affect their immediate health, but it can also lead to obesity in adulthood. The aim of the study was to compare BMI cut-off points by examining three main international references: the World Health Organization (WHO), the International Task Force Obesity (IOTF) and the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Ultimately, the study group consisted of 18,144 c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The line of equality is shown (dashed), and points are coded by sex and data source, while regression lines per facet are coded by data source. The lines for obesity and overweight with Deren 16 are close to the line of equality, while those for thinness and for Wijnhoven 24 are not difference in prevalence dZ A,B on the z-score scale between the two references, ranging from $0 for the horizontal lines to >1 for IOTF 18.5 versus WHO À2 in girls. The background grey triangles correspond to the nominal prevalence rates defined by the three reference cut-offs, for example, 16% for WHO +1 and 15% for CDC 85.…”
Section: Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The line of equality is shown (dashed), and points are coded by sex and data source, while regression lines per facet are coded by data source. The lines for obesity and overweight with Deren 16 are close to the line of equality, while those for thinness and for Wijnhoven 24 are not difference in prevalence dZ A,B on the z-score scale between the two references, ranging from $0 for the horizontal lines to >1 for IOTF 18.5 versus WHO À2 in girls. The background grey triangles correspond to the nominal prevalence rates defined by the three reference cut-offs, for example, 16% for WHO +1 and 15% for CDC 85.…”
Section: Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This shows that because the IOTF cut-off is higher than the WHO cut-off, overweight is less common with IOTF. 2,8,16 The points in Figure 1…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(3) For children with GOB or AOB at baseline, we also categorized their adiposity parameter (BMI or WHtR) change during the follow-up as ten equal groups (Group 1: �P 10 , Group 2: P 10~P20 , Group 3: P 20~P30 , Group 4: P 30~P40 , Group 5: P 40~P50 , Group 6: P 50~P60 , Group 7: P 60~P70 , Group 8: P 70~P80 , Group 9: P 80~P90 and Group 10: >P 90 ) and compared the risk of HBP in different groups with multivariate logistic models. (4) We used an international definition of child obesity developed by the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) and the World Health Organization (WHO) standard of obesity for 5-19 years old children to test the associations [18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. (5) We also used BMI standard deviation score (BMI SDS) instead of BMI to compare the risk of HBP in different groups with multivariate logistic models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second study was carried out in 2018/2019 and the methodology has been published in detail [ 14 ]. The study was repeated in 2018/2019 in the same schools as in 2013/2014, in accordance with the previous protocol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%