2011
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2011.0033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Blood Glucose Predictors: The Prediction-Error Grid Analysis

Abstract: We propose a new CG-EGA, the PRED-EGA, for the assessment of glucose predictors. The presented analysis shows that, compared with the straightforward application of the CG-EGA, the PRED-EGA gives a significant reduction of the misclassification cases. A reduction by a factor of at least 4 was observed in the study. Moreover, the PRED-EGA is much more robust against uncertainty in the input and references.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Clarke error-grid analysis (CEGA) [30][31][32] is a popular method to evaluate the BG prediction performance. In brief, a larger percentage in Zone A means better prediction performance.…”
Section: The Relative Error Analysis Is Defined As Followsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clarke error-grid analysis (CEGA) [30][31][32] is a popular method to evaluate the BG prediction performance. In brief, a larger percentage in Zone A means better prediction performance.…”
Section: The Relative Error Analysis Is Defined As Followsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main aim of this section is to discuss the performance of the method (24) equipped with the adaptive parameter choice rule (31) in predicting the blood glucose (BG) evolution.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These simulated measurements have been corrupted by random white noise with the standard deviation δ of 6 (mg/dL). We perform our illustrative tests with data of the same 10 virtual subjects that have been considered in [25], [31].…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations