2004
DOI: 10.14358/pers.70.5.581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Bidirectional Effects over Aquatic Macrophyte Vegetation in CIR Aerial Photographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the most common computer-aided analyses applied in SAV research are described below. Readers are directed to [80,81,[283][284][285] for examples of the quantitative analysis of photographs not covered here.…”
Section: Analysis Of Passive Optical Rs Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most common computer-aided analyses applied in SAV research are described below. Readers are directed to [80,81,[283][284][285] for examples of the quantitative analysis of photographs not covered here.…”
Section: Analysis Of Passive Optical Rs Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been indicated that aquatic vegetation yields spectrally distinct signals governed by the density of the vegetation, the openness of the canopy and the amounts, forms and orientations of the leaves [ 2 - 5 ]. Since traditional quantitative ground investigations on the scale of a whole lake are laborious, remote sensing methods are increasingly being used for mapping aquatic vegetation and estimating their distribution and biomass [ 6 - 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malthus and George [ 19 ] demonstrated that a combination of band 3 (520-600 nm), band 7 (760-900 nm), and band 8 (910-1050 nm) data from the Daedalus Airborne Thematic Mapper could discriminate between different macrophyte growth forms. The DN (Digital Number) value, a sum of contributions due to atmosphere, water column and bottom, has been most commonly used to estimate vegetation biomass with an empirical linear or non-linear fitting model [ 9 ]. If the influence of the water column could be removed from the remotely sensed images, the potential of optical remote sensing in littoral applications would be extended and the accuracy of classification and biomass retrieval would be improved to a certain extent [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of a 520 nm cut-off filter, a filter cutting out part of the reflectance in the near-infrared wavelength (NIR) area, and an anti-vignette coating to remove most of the light falloff effect (Lillesand and Kiefer 1994) were used when taking the photographs in 1996 and 2001, but as the 1953 photographs were acquired without such filters, brightness variations due to light falloff are expected to be present in these. The aerial photographs were acquired according to the criteria and plan described elsewhere by Valta-Hulkkonen et al (2004). Those for 1953 and Table 1.…”
Section: Aerial Photograph Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, methods for correcting these effects in frame format data have been developed further than those for airborne scanner data, for instance. The causes of brightness variations, their effects and the available correction methods are presented in detail in Pellikka (1998), Mikkola and Pellikka (2002) and Valta-Hulkkonen et al (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%