2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of biases associated with profiling simple, model communities using terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism-based analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is largely dependent on how incomplete the DNA extraction from the sample is, and on biases in the target gene amplification. Earlier studies have addressed both factors, showed their overall importance, and identified the principle source of amplification bias, such as PCR primer discrimination against certain templates and/or inhibition of the more abundant templates' amplification by self-annealing (Suzuki and Giovannoni, 1996;Polz and cavanaugh, 1998;Webster et al, 2003;Acinas et al, 2004;Kurata et al, 2004;Frey et al, 2006;Sipos et al, 2007). This produces a qualitative picture of the overall importance of the PCR biases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is largely dependent on how incomplete the DNA extraction from the sample is, and on biases in the target gene amplification. Earlier studies have addressed both factors, showed their overall importance, and identified the principle source of amplification bias, such as PCR primer discrimination against certain templates and/or inhibition of the more abundant templates' amplification by self-annealing (Suzuki and Giovannoni, 1996;Polz and cavanaugh, 1998;Webster et al, 2003;Acinas et al, 2004;Kurata et al, 2004;Frey et al, 2006;Sipos et al, 2007). This produces a qualitative picture of the overall importance of the PCR biases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, existing DNA extraction protocols are not 100% efficient (Stach et al, 2001). It is well known that this skews the frequency distribution of rRNA gene species among the PCR products, in clone libraries, and in eventual sequence inventories (Tiedje, 1994;Suzuki and Giovannoni, 1996;Polz and Cavanaugh 1998;Acinas et al, 2004;Caron et al, 2004;Kurata et al, 2004;Frey et al, 2006;Sipos et al, 2007). What is not known is whether an increase in sequencing efforts, such as that afforded by the 454 Life Sciences sequencing technology (Sogin et al, 2006;Huber et al, 2007) would theoretically ensure a recovery of all rare rRNA species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that this assumption is also tenuous due to complex interactions between taxa in ribosomal copy number, PCR bias, and DNA extraction bias (11). It is important to note that analysis of profiles by ordination is based on comparisons between rather than within samples and on the more realistic assumption that biases affecting taxa are the same across samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is generally accepted that the intersample variation in relative peak areas should not be affected by the biased PCR conditions because they similarly apply to all OTUs and samples (2,42). However, using peak areas as an indicator for absolute abundance has been confirmed to be a fruitless exercise, even when using simplified microbial communities (4,10,55). However, when experiments are performed under well-defined laboratory conditions or on simplified communities whose rrs copy numbers per genome are known, quantitative estimates of each target organism may be successfully obtained via community fingerprinting methods (27,41).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%