2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of beef production from Brahman×Thai native and Charolais×Thai native crossbred bulls slaughtered at different weights. II: Meat quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
31
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
10
31
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant differences in pH were found among breeds (Crawford et al, 2010;Waritthitham, Lambertz, Langholz, Wicke, & Gauly, 2010) and different muscles (Kadim, Mahgoub, Al-Kindi, Al-Marzooqi, & Al-Saqri, 2006), and were similar to that found in the present study for fresh meat (Table 1). Xinjiang Merino had a higher pH (P < 0.001) than Bashbay sheep, and M. supraspinatus had a higher pH (P < 0.001) compared to the M. gluteus and M. longissimus dorsi.…”
Section: Chemical Composition and Ph Of Musclessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Significant differences in pH were found among breeds (Crawford et al, 2010;Waritthitham, Lambertz, Langholz, Wicke, & Gauly, 2010) and different muscles (Kadim, Mahgoub, Al-Kindi, Al-Marzooqi, & Al-Saqri, 2006), and were similar to that found in the present study for fresh meat (Table 1). Xinjiang Merino had a higher pH (P < 0.001) than Bashbay sheep, and M. supraspinatus had a higher pH (P < 0.001) compared to the M. gluteus and M. longissimus dorsi.…”
Section: Chemical Composition and Ph Of Musclessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Chemical composition parameters were similar for HF and JEX bull beef and for the two first-season treatments (P > 0.05; Table 3). Mean IMF content in all groups ranged from 2.02% to 4.04%, which was within the range from 0.45% to 6.65% indicated in Waritthitham et al (2010) for IMF content among beef breeds. The average IMF content of LT muscle observed here was low (< 5%) and this finding is in agreement with other reports (O'Neill et al, 2004;Riley et al, 2005;Serra et al, 2008).…”
Section: Evaluation By the Trained Sensory Panelsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Likewise, the greater hue angle in HF after both 2 h (P < 0.001) and 24 h (P < 0.01) of blooming compared to JEX beef indicates a less pure red colour in HF. This is possibly due to the higher WHC of JEX beef, resulting in more myoglobin remaining after chilling for 24 h (Waritthitham et al, 2010). The metmyoglobin reducing activity, or the amount of its essential cofactor reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), can also cause differences in redness development in meat between breeds (Bekhit and Faustman, 2005).…”
Section: Chemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the current meta-analyses in young bulls and cows, insoluble collagen content in the Longissimus muscle was similar among different breeds of bulls slaughtered at various slaughter points in previous studies Waritthitham et al, 2010). However, no information was available for slaughter weight or age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%