2017
DOI: 10.21769/bioprotoc.2595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Aversion of Acute Pain Stimulus through Conditioned Place Aversion

Abstract: Pain is a complex experience. The aversive component of pain has been assessed through conditioned place aversion in rodents. However, this behavioral test does not allow the evaluation of the aversion of an acute pain stimulus. In Zhang et al. (2017), we provide an updated version of a Conditioned Place Aversion paradigm to address this challenge. In this protocol, a detailed version of this method is described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In rodents, the ‘unpleasantness’ of pain and its affective component is usually characterized as an avoidance of the pain stimulus, while pain behaviors such as licking, jumping, and hypersensitivity are assumed to represent sensory-discriminative components of the processing of nociceptive input. Often, the conditioned place avoidance test, which measures the percentage of time spent avoiding an aversive context, is used to distinguish the affective component of pain from its sensory or reflexive aspects (Urien et al, 2017). Using conditioned place avoidance, multiple brain regions have been shown to play crucial roles in encoding the affective components of pain, including: the PFC, ACC, and prelimbic subdivisions (Jiang et al, 2014; Johansen et al, 2001), as well as the central and basolateral nuclei of the amygdala (BLA; Han et al, 2015; Neugebauer, 2015; Tanimoto et al, 2003), as discussed in the following section.…”
Section: Topic Area Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In rodents, the ‘unpleasantness’ of pain and its affective component is usually characterized as an avoidance of the pain stimulus, while pain behaviors such as licking, jumping, and hypersensitivity are assumed to represent sensory-discriminative components of the processing of nociceptive input. Often, the conditioned place avoidance test, which measures the percentage of time spent avoiding an aversive context, is used to distinguish the affective component of pain from its sensory or reflexive aspects (Urien et al, 2017). Using conditioned place avoidance, multiple brain regions have been shown to play crucial roles in encoding the affective components of pain, including: the PFC, ACC, and prelimbic subdivisions (Jiang et al, 2014; Johansen et al, 2001), as well as the central and basolateral nuclei of the amygdala (BLA; Han et al, 2015; Neugebauer, 2015; Tanimoto et al, 2003), as discussed in the following section.…”
Section: Topic Area Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely accepted that stress contributes to the severity and frequency of migraine attacks[ 26 , 27 ]. In laboratory studies using animal models, the reward- and/or penalty-conditioned paradigms, such as conditioned place preference (CPP) and/or conditioned place aversion (CPA), are the common procedures to assess the affective component of pain and then analyze its mechanisms[ 34 ]. Animals are conditioned with CPA paradigm where aversive stimuli (like varieties of stress) can “teach” animals to avoid environments (or objects) that are associated with aversive stimuli by psychologically producing negative, unpleasant affect[ 31 ] and by behaviorally inducing avoidance or escape[ 35 ].…”
Section: Unpleasantness Component Of Migraine Painmentioning
confidence: 99%