2017
DOI: 10.3390/rs9040322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Atmospheric Correction Methods for Sentinel-2 MSI Images Applied to Amazon Floodplain Lakes

Abstract: Satellite data provide the only viable means for extensive monitoring of remote and large freshwater systems, such as the Amazon floodplain lakes. However, an accurate atmospheric correction is required to retrieve water constituents based on surface water reflectance (R W ). In this paper, we assessed three atmospheric correction methods (Second Simulation of a Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum (6SV), ACOLITE and Sen2Cor) applied to an image acquired by the MultiSpectral Instrument (MSI) on-board of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
102
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
7
102
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Sen2cor atmospheric correction procedure in the Sentinel-2 toolbox was not designed for water bodies [20] and was proven inappropriate for estimating reflectances within the NIR region, particularly for reflectance at 705 nm (S2A band 5). Although ACOLITE, an atmospheric correction method for water bodies [19], provided a better estimation for the NIR region, the estimation was not always stable and accurate for visible region [30]. Therefore, the traditional empirical line method (ELM), which was recognized as the most precise method for atmospheric correction, particularly for atmospheric correction over water areas [31][32][33], was used in this study.…”
Section: Image Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sen2cor atmospheric correction procedure in the Sentinel-2 toolbox was not designed for water bodies [20] and was proven inappropriate for estimating reflectances within the NIR region, particularly for reflectance at 705 nm (S2A band 5). Although ACOLITE, an atmospheric correction method for water bodies [19], provided a better estimation for the NIR region, the estimation was not always stable and accurate for visible region [30]. Therefore, the traditional empirical line method (ELM), which was recognized as the most precise method for atmospheric correction, particularly for atmospheric correction over water areas [31][32][33], was used in this study.…”
Section: Image Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the atmospheric correction is performed using two models: Sen2Cor and 6SV. Sen2Cor was developed by ESA for applications over land surfaces but it is also applied over water surfaces, with several studies presenting good estimates of surface reflectances used for monitoring water quality parameters in lakes and reservoirs, such as colored dissolved organic matter, chlorophyll a, turbidity, or SD [23,27,32]. The 6SV is an advanced radiative transfer code capable of accounting for radiation polarization in a mixed molecular-aerosol atmosphere being a vector version of the 6S [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 6SV is an advanced radiative transfer code capable of accounting for radiation polarization in a mixed molecular-aerosol atmosphere being a vector version of the 6S [33]. The 6S atmospheric correction has already been successfully used in lakes and reservoirs [21,32,[34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…López-Serrano et al [46] evaluated the performance of the COST, ATCOR2, FLAASH, 6S, and TOA algorithms for the estimation of forest above-ground biomass. Martins et al [47] compared the 6S, ACOLITE, and Sen2Cor methods applied to the new platform Sentinel 2-MSI. However, these studies lack the multitemporal component and only a few studies [48][49][50] have been developed to compare the methods of radiometric correction on different dates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%