2019
DOI: 10.1177/0956462418815292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of antiretroviral third agent virologic durability after initiation of first antiretroviral regimen

Abstract: Information on the virologic durability of modern antiretroviral regimens is important to clinicians. We aimed to describe virologic durability of first-line integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-, or protease inhibitor (PI)-based antiretroviral regimens. This was a retrospective study of antiretroviral-naïve patients that initiated first-line antiretroviral regimens with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and an INSTI, NNRTI, or PI bet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(55 reference statements)
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 The majority of patients in the present study who were treated initially with NNRTIs and PIs switched to INSTIs regardless of switching times and/or backbone drugs, with low switch rates thereafter. These ndings and similar ndings reported by other investigators [20][21][22] suggest that INSTIs may be the most durable anchor drug class for PLWH on ART regimens, regardless of backbone drugs in the rst ART regimen. Analysis of a large dataset of HIV-positive patients con rmed that initial INSTI-based regimens combined with TDF, TAF, or ABC were all potent and well tolerated without signi cant virological failure; only a small percentage of patients (12%) discontinued INSTI regimens, and DTG showed the lowest risk of virological failure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…12 The majority of patients in the present study who were treated initially with NNRTIs and PIs switched to INSTIs regardless of switching times and/or backbone drugs, with low switch rates thereafter. These ndings and similar ndings reported by other investigators [20][21][22] suggest that INSTIs may be the most durable anchor drug class for PLWH on ART regimens, regardless of backbone drugs in the rst ART regimen. Analysis of a large dataset of HIV-positive patients con rmed that initial INSTI-based regimens combined with TDF, TAF, or ABC were all potent and well tolerated without signi cant virological failure; only a small percentage of patients (12%) discontinued INSTI regimens, and DTG showed the lowest risk of virological failure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The informations of percentage of STR uses were lack. They found that being on an INSTI or NNRTI-based regimens versus PI regimen, frequent VL testing and longer duration on of ART were associated with better durability [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study from Maple Leaf Medical Clinic in Canada, researchers found that being on an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens versus protease inhibitors (PI) regimen were associated with better durability. However, the informations of percentage of STR uses were lack [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No information on the percentage of STR uses were lack. They found that being on an INSTI or NNRTI-based regimens versus PI regimen, frequent VL testing and longer duration on of ART were associated with better durability [ 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study from Maple Leaf Medical Clinic in Canada, researchers found that being on an integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens versus protease inhibitors (PI) regimen were associated with longer time to virologic failure and better virologic durability. However, the information of durability of STR uses was lack [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%