2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2015.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli isolates and screening of Salmonella spp. in wild ungulates from Portugal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(43 reference statements)
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sampling strategy is known to have a major impact in the detection rate of salmonellae (Sanno et al., ; Wahlström et al., ). Besides the present work, where 2.9% of faecal samples from wild boars resulted positive for salmonellae, previous studies in the Iberian Peninsula reported highly variable prevalence values: 1.2% (Díaz‐Sánchez et al., ), 5% (Dias et al., ), 22.1% (Vieira‐Pinto et al., ) and 17.5%–35.6% (Navarro‐Gonzalez et al., ). Great variability has been found in other European regions as Italy, with values of 10.8% (Zottola et al., ) and 24.8% (Chiari, Zanoni, Tagliabue, Lavazza, & Alborali, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The sampling strategy is known to have a major impact in the detection rate of salmonellae (Sanno et al., ; Wahlström et al., ). Besides the present work, where 2.9% of faecal samples from wild boars resulted positive for salmonellae, previous studies in the Iberian Peninsula reported highly variable prevalence values: 1.2% (Díaz‐Sánchez et al., ), 5% (Dias et al., ), 22.1% (Vieira‐Pinto et al., ) and 17.5%–35.6% (Navarro‐Gonzalez et al., ). Great variability has been found in other European regions as Italy, with values of 10.8% (Zottola et al., ) and 24.8% (Chiari, Zanoni, Tagliabue, Lavazza, & Alborali, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…No resistance was detected against FOX and IPM. In Portugal, Dias et al 26 analyzing 152 E. coli from 67 fecal samples from wild ungulates, which represent the main prey for wolves, detected the highest resistance against AMC (16.45%); followed by AM (9.87%), TE (8.55%), S (4.61%), and FOX (0.66%). All isolates were susceptible to ATM, CTX, C, and IPM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of antibiotics in various situations, from agriculture to the food industry, has resulted in a constant release of low-level antibiotic concentration into the water and soil through wastewater treatment plant effluents, sewage, agricultural waste and the application of manure fertilizer to fields and gardens, among others (Anon., 2006; Dias et al, 2015). This environmental pollution, together with co-habitation of livestock and wild animals and increased human contact, allows antibiotic compounds to reach more remote natural habitats.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Resistance In Wildlife Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This environmental pollution, together with co-habitation of livestock and wild animals and increased human contact, allows antibiotic compounds to reach more remote natural habitats. This alters the population dynamics of microorganisms, encouraging the development of ABR in microbiological communities of wild animals through heightened selection pressure of resistance (Martínez, 2008;Dias et al, 2015). Importantly, water is a major transmission vector for antibiotic resistant microorganisms.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Resistance In Wildlife Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%