2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3800(02)00327-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of alternative approaches for bioclimatic modeling with special emphasis on the Mahalanobis distance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
269
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(274 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
269
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce this error, outliers were identified by a multi-dimensional-based approach using Mahalanobis distances [47] and were eliminated if they occurred outside the 5-95th range of the niche space using the raster package [48] in R [49]. In this process, the climatic combinations at each site of the occurrence were given a Mahalanobis distance in relation to a vector describing the mean conditions found within the dataset, which is assumed to represent the 'optimal' climatic niche of the species [47]. In this way, any site with different environmental conditions from the mean climatic niche can be identified.…”
Section: Seed Zone Delimitation Of P Orientalis and Occurrence Data mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce this error, outliers were identified by a multi-dimensional-based approach using Mahalanobis distances [47] and were eliminated if they occurred outside the 5-95th range of the niche space using the raster package [48] in R [49]. In this process, the climatic combinations at each site of the occurrence were given a Mahalanobis distance in relation to a vector describing the mean conditions found within the dataset, which is assumed to represent the 'optimal' climatic niche of the species [47]. In this way, any site with different environmental conditions from the mean climatic niche can be identified.…”
Section: Seed Zone Delimitation Of P Orientalis and Occurrence Data mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected nine eNM techniques, consisting of a variety of methods and concepts, and combined them into three groups from which were generated ensemble forecasting predictions: (i) bioclimatic envelope and distance-based models -BIOCLIM (Busby 1991), Gower distance (Carpenter et al 1993), Mahalanobis distance (Farber and Kadmon 2003), and ensemble forecasting of bioclimatic envelope and distance models; (ii) statistical models -Generalized Linear Models (GLM; McCullagh and Nelder 1989), Generalized Additive Models (GAM; Hastie and Tibshirani 1990) (Breiman 2001), and ensemble forecasting of machine learning. The ensemble consensuses were generated by a mean of all single-models for each group considered.…”
Section: Ecological Niche Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude and direction of the biases introduced through the use of an imperfect reference vary as a function of the quality of the reference data and its relationship to the data evaluated (Valenstein, 1990). It is, therefore, important to base an accuracy assessment on high quality reference data (Farber and Kadmon, 2003).…”
Section: Accuracy and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One feature often stressed in the ecological literature is that a useful measure of accuracy should be independent of prevalence (Manel et al, 2001). Thus, the use of some of the popular measures which are prevalent dependent, such as the overall accuracy and positive predicted value, is often discouraged in ecological applications discouraged (Fielding and Bell, 1997;Manel et al, 2001;Farber and Kadmon, 2003;Freeman and Moisen, 2008). It should be noted that the popular kappa coefficient of agreement is also prevalent dependent (Manel et al, 2001;McPherson et al, 2004;Freeman and Moisen, 2008) and prevalence correction may be unsuitable (Hoehler, 2000).…”
Section: Accuracy and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%