2014
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbu083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of algal photosynthesis in planktic foraminifers by fast repetition rate fluorometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
49
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
9
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When functional chlorophyll was detected in a specimen, then the maximum fluorescence (Fm) value was used to estimate chlorophyll a (Chl a) content of the specimen based on a linear relationship between Fm and Chl a (cf. Fujiki et al, 2014;Takagi et al, 2016). Calibration line was established for each FRR fluorometer.…”
Section: And 4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When functional chlorophyll was detected in a specimen, then the maximum fluorescence (Fm) value was used to estimate chlorophyll a (Chl a) content of the specimen based on a linear relationship between Fm and Chl a (cf. Fujiki et al, 2014;Takagi et al, 2016). Calibration line was established for each FRR fluorometer.…”
Section: And 4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods have been used in benthic symbiont-bearing foraminifera (e.g., Uthicke, 2006;Schmidt et al, 2011;Ziegler and Uthicke, 2011) and recently successfully adapted for application on single specimens of living planktonic foraminifera (Fujiki et al, 2014;Takagi et al, 2016Takagi et al, , 2018. An active chlorophyll fluorometry performs non-destructive and non-invasive measurements of algal physiology based on real-time variable fluorescence profiles (Kolber and Falkowski, 1993), allowing us to quantify chlorophyll a content of a specimen, the health of its symbionts and their light-level adaptation (Fujiki et al, 2014;Takagi et al, 2018). The measurements can be performed almost immediately after collection, with minimal manipulations, thus minimizing damage to the foraminifera and circumventing culturing stress-induced artifacts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the empirical proxy relationships we apply to our data have been calibrated using bulk shell compositions and over a range of seawater compositions that are much narrower than our DIC experiments. Secondly, the rates of photosynthesis and respiration are constant in the model, although they have been observed to change daily with changes in symbiont productivity (Spero and Parker, 1985) and throughout the foraminifer's ontogeny as it grows and symbiont numbers increase (Fujiki et al 2014;Spero and Parker, 1985;Takagi et al, 2016). This might explain why B/Ca and U/Ca banding overlies broader compositional trends that occur with shell thickening over multiple days of growth (Fig.…”
Section: -mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symbionts of type II were ultrastructurally distinct from type I, but it was not possible to distinguish them as haptophytes or chrysophytes (Faber et al 1988 ). Recently, a study obtained the 18S rDNA sequence of the symbiont from hosts collected in the North Pacifi c and showed that the symbiont of type II is related to the genus Pelagomonas (Fujiki et al 2014 ).…”
Section: Planktonic Foraminiferamentioning
confidence: 99%