1983
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.38.10.1055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of alcohol use with multidimensional concepts and measures.

Abstract: Results from 15 years of research based on samples of substantial size are reviewed. These studies favor a hypothesis that the phenomena referred to as alcoholism are by no means unitary. The term alcoholism is best regarded as merely a rubric under which several distinct conditions can be grouped. Results from studies of the covariations among self-reported symptoms and other drinkingrelated variables indicate some 15 psychometrically independent first-order factors, the interrelationships among which indicat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…DTC was assessed using the mood management scale of the alcohol use inventory (Horn & Wanberg, 1983). The sources of the covariation between early first drink and DTC were estimated using bivariate twin modeling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DTC was assessed using the mood management scale of the alcohol use inventory (Horn & Wanberg, 1983). The sources of the covariation between early first drink and DTC were estimated using bivariate twin modeling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alcohol Use Inventory (AUI; Wanberg & Horn, 1983, 1985Wanberg, Horn, & Foster, 1977). The Alcohol Use Inventory was developed out of a series of studies designed to identify linear patterns of self-report variables that measure behaviors, attitudes, and symptoms associated with the use of alcohol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The least frequently endorsed items were: using drugs with a needle (7%), sharing cutting objects (9%), exchanging sex for money or drugs (9%), ever had an STD (10%), ever been pregnant or been a dad (12%), thinking of cutting self (12%), and vomiting or using laxatives for weight control (12%). Table 2 presents the coefficient alphas, proportion of unique variance [42] for the determined factors, and the total sample means, standard deviations, and ranges for each of the factors. This preliminary analysis suggests that all subscales have reasonable internal consistency reliability and appear to be independent measures, rather than part of a single unitary construct.…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysis Of the Attitude Scalementioning
confidence: 99%