2017
DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of age‐ and sex‐related changes in baggy lower eyelids using a novel objective image analysis method: Orbital gray scale analysis

Abstract: The M-C-L classification and OGS were significantly associated with both age and sex, proving that they could be potent objective assessment tools for BLEs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously conducted an objective analysis of nasolabial wrinkles by using linear gray scale analysis and have devised a similar method for analyzing objective values for BLEs . This method, called the OGS, uses ImageJ software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) to objectively obtain the respective scores of medial, central, and lateral lower eyelid fat.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We have previously conducted an objective analysis of nasolabial wrinkles by using linear gray scale analysis and have devised a similar method for analyzing objective values for BLEs . This method, called the OGS, uses ImageJ software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) to objectively obtain the respective scores of medial, central, and lateral lower eyelid fat.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OGS measures the difference of the gray scale value between the lower eyelid fold and the surrounding area. The detailed definition of the OGS has been described in our previous study . Moreover, we newly defined the sum of the medial, central, and lateral OGS values as the “total OGS” to reflect the entire area of eyelid fat.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations