2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0150-9861(05)83164-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of acute spontaneous intracerebral hematoma by CT perfusion imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supporting this theory, we found a positive correlation between the size of the area of reduced perfusion and the hematoma size. In agreement with the findings of Fainardi, 3 we found a moderate negative correlation between hematoma size and relative CBF (rϭϪ0.401, Pϭ0.02) and a positive correlation between hematoma size and dTTP (rϭ0.397, Pϭ0.02).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Supporting this theory, we found a positive correlation between the size of the area of reduced perfusion and the hematoma size. In agreement with the findings of Fainardi, 3 we found a moderate negative correlation between hematoma size and relative CBF (rϭϪ0.401, Pϭ0.02) and a positive correlation between hematoma size and dTTP (rϭ0.397, Pϭ0.02).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is consistent with the literature. [1][2][3][4]7,8 Our perfusion values agree well with those reported for the perihemorrhagic area by Fainardi and coworkers who used perfusion CT 3 (relative CBF: 0.51; relative CBV: 0.61; dTTP: 1.2 seconds; relative values calculated by the authors from absolute values in 3 ) and with those from Zazulia and coauthors (relative CBF: 0.56) who used positron emission tomography. 1 The perfusion reduction is less pronounced than the one reported for infarcted tissue in acute ischemic stroke by König and colleagues (relative CBF: 0.51 versus 0.34; relative CBV: 0.62 versus 0.43; dTTP: 1.76 versus 4.8), 11 who used the same PCT method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…perfusion (Fainardi et al, 2005;Rosand et al, 2002), and positron emission tomography ) subsequently found perihematomal hypoperfusion but no evidence of perihematomal ischemic tissue. It is now thought that these areas of perihematomal hypoperfusion arise as a consequence of decreased metabolic demand as opposed to ischemia, as evidenced by a normal or reduced oxygen extraction fraction in perihematomal tissue measured by positron emission tomography imaging in acute clinical ICH (Schellinger et al, 2003;Zazulia et al, 2001).…”
Section: A Perihematomal Penumbramentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Various imaging techniques are employed to study ongoing secondary neuronal injury in the perihematomal region, including positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), MR perfusion, and CT [19,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. Specifically, the results of PET studies have not shown evidence of hypoxia or ischemia (i.e., normal oxygen extraction fraction and 18 F-fluoromisonidazole uptake) surrounding the intraparenchymal hemorrhage.…”
Section: New Imaging Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%