2002
DOI: 10.1080/00131880210135313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of achievement through portfolios and teacher-made tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
33
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
6
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were consistent with previous findings that keeping a portfolio increase student's learning responsibilities (Pollari, 2000;Barootchi et al, 2002). Keeping a portfolio requires responsibility, in the whole process of the portfolio assessment, the students are required to be involved in the decision-making along with the teacher, Moreover, the idea of keeping the tasks in a portfolio may increase the necessity of doing them, and the weekly plan sheet reminded them of what they should be doing throughout the week.…”
Section: Student's Views Of the Impact Of Portfolio Assessment On Thesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The results were consistent with previous findings that keeping a portfolio increase student's learning responsibilities (Pollari, 2000;Barootchi et al, 2002). Keeping a portfolio requires responsibility, in the whole process of the portfolio assessment, the students are required to be involved in the decision-making along with the teacher, Moreover, the idea of keeping the tasks in a portfolio may increase the necessity of doing them, and the weekly plan sheet reminded them of what they should be doing throughout the week.…”
Section: Student's Views Of the Impact Of Portfolio Assessment On Thesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Nonetheless, teachers are cognizant that what appears in the IUEE and the practices they render during class hours are not in line with current methods of language teaching and learning (Barootchi & Keshavarz, 2002;Hamayan, 1995;Wolf et al, 1991;Tsagari, 2004). Yet, they do not hesitate to act according to test methods priorities.…”
Section: Language Teachers and Evaluation Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This controversy is related to certain intellectual frameworks, methodological issues, psychological and educational foundations on which AE is based (Allam, 2004;Barootchi & Keshavarz, 2002;Gökhan, 2015).…”
Section: Da Vid Publishing Dmentioning
confidence: 99%