2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Accuracy and Reliability in Preoperative Templating for Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…THRA is an alternative method to THA for young, active patients with hip diseases [10][11][12]. THRA enables the preservation of an intact femoral bone, potentially improves the prognosis of future hip joint arthroplasties, closely mimics the normal anatomy of the proximal part of the femur for hip articulation, optimizes stress transfer, and offers inherent stability and optimal range of movement [13,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…THRA is an alternative method to THA for young, active patients with hip diseases [10][11][12]. THRA enables the preservation of an intact femoral bone, potentially improves the prognosis of future hip joint arthroplasties, closely mimics the normal anatomy of the proximal part of the femur for hip articulation, optimizes stress transfer, and offers inherent stability and optimal range of movement [13,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Further studies investigated the reproducibility and accuracy of different software on digital images, but the relationship between surgical experience and quality of templating in THA was not examined (Table 2). 16,17 The current study had several limitations. Group B consisted of only 1 experienced surgeon with a higher accuracy than the mean of the less experienced colleagues.…”
Section: A 2bmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…9,44 It has been suggested that undersizing of the femoral component occurs not infrequently when using digital pre-operative templating which increases the likelihood of notching. 46 In a study on composite femora a notch of 5 mm weakened the femur by 47% whereas that of 2 mm weakened it by 24%. 47 From this it can be extrapolated that a notch of 2 mm in a patient receiving a femoral component of 38 mm is relatively more serious than in a patient receiving a component of 55 mm.…”
Section: Orientation Of the Componentmentioning
confidence: 98%